2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10654-009-9352-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of risk factors for non-fatal acute myocardial infarction

Abstract: The impact of risk factors for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) strongly differs across populations and most studies do not consider age as an effect modifier. This study aims to estimate the population attributable fractions (PAFs) of established risk factors for non-fatal AMI, considering age stratification, within a population-based casecontrol study of Portuguese men. Cases were male patients consecutively admitted with an incident AMI, during 1999-2003 (n = 638) and controls were a representative sample … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency of this result is likely because most epidemiological research on the influence of social factors on risk of chronic disease has been conducted in populations more advanced in the ET. This is also true for many other diseases, as studies on samples from demographically, economically, and educationally developed populations report a steep negative gradient of education on morbidity and on mortality, as well as lower risk for a range of heath conditions including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertension, and overweight (Baker et al, 2011;Cirera et al, 1998;Mirowsky and Ross, 2003;Oliveira et al, 2009). This conclusion notwithstanding, several studies in the metaanalysis indicate that the direction of the education effect can vary depending on the ET stage of the country.…”
Section: Discussion and The Population Education Transition Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The consistency of this result is likely because most epidemiological research on the influence of social factors on risk of chronic disease has been conducted in populations more advanced in the ET. This is also true for many other diseases, as studies on samples from demographically, economically, and educationally developed populations report a steep negative gradient of education on morbidity and on mortality, as well as lower risk for a range of heath conditions including acute myocardial infarction (AMI), hypertension, and overweight (Baker et al, 2011;Cirera et al, 1998;Mirowsky and Ross, 2003;Oliveira et al, 2009). This conclusion notwithstanding, several studies in the metaanalysis indicate that the direction of the education effect can vary depending on the ET stage of the country.…”
Section: Discussion and The Population Education Transition Curvementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes and obesity are common diseases with major impact on morbidity and mortality in adulthood [14]. Multiple epidemiological studies, of which many have been published in the European Journal of Epidemiology , identified various risk factors in childhood and adulthood for these diseases [535].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then these studies were further the scrutinized at different stages and the major portion of identified studies was excluded on the basis of; irrelevant material, inconsistency with the objectives of Meta-analysis, poor reporting, quality of work and lack of statistical data (detail is given in Flow Chart 1). Twenty eight (28) (19) studies had discussed the association between gender and MI. Eight (8) studies had described the association between levels of education and risk of MI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It might be assumed that self-management can differ in educated person. It has been found that education level is independently and strongly associated with MI particularly among younger men [19]. In this study, there is an attempt to pool the results of different studies regarding associations of these non-clinical risk factors with MI through a Meta-Analysis Approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%