2021
DOI: 10.3390/foods10102396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Purchase Preference, Perceived Value, and Marketing Mix on Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay for Pork

Abstract: This study explored the effects of purchase preference, perceived value, and marketing mix on consumers’ purchase intention and willingness to pay for pork in Taiwan. A questionnaire was distributed to pork consumers in an online platform, and a total of 1042 valid samples were collected. An analysis of the questionnaire responses revealed three purchase preference factors, namely flavour, certification marks, and added features; four perceived value factors, namely functional, social, conditional, and emotion… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to perceived value theory, consumers evaluate the utility of a product or service based on perceptions of its benefits and costs (Green & Peloza, 2011). They have different preferences for different product features, and their purchase intention is influenced by the value they derive from such features (Kung et al, 2021). The higher the utility consumers derive from such features, the stronger the intention to purchase the product (Yuen et al, 2016), which is likely to influence their willingness to pay a premium for such products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to perceived value theory, consumers evaluate the utility of a product or service based on perceptions of its benefits and costs (Green & Peloza, 2011). They have different preferences for different product features, and their purchase intention is influenced by the value they derive from such features (Kung et al, 2021). The higher the utility consumers derive from such features, the stronger the intention to purchase the product (Yuen et al, 2016), which is likely to influence their willingness to pay a premium for such products.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Yang et al (2022) found that hedonic presentation of minimally branded products had positive effects on both purchase intention and willingness to pay. It is important to note, however, Kung et al (2021) showed that WTP and purchase intention had differential influencing factors: Purchase intention was positively affected by functional value, purchase frequency, conditional value, and product marketing positively, whereas WTP was positively affected by promotional marketing, monthly disposable income, and social value. We proposed the following hypotheses:…”
Section: Effect Of Discount Frame On Consumer Responsesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Therefore, investigating whether there prior results can generalize to WTP is of practical importance. We did not make a precise hypothesis regarding the effect of discount frame on WTP because of the conflicting evidence: While some studies show that both purchase intention and WTP can be positively influenced by product presentation (Yang et al, 2022), other studies indicate that WTP and purchase intention had differential influencing factors (Kung et al, 2021).…”
Section: Effect Of Discount Frame On Consumer Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has indicated that pork quality, brand, certification and even consumer education level, socioeconomic status, average income, lifestyle and green consumption habits affect willingness to pay (Bjørner et al, 2004;Liebe et al, 2010;Van Kempen, 2004). Lim et al (2013) identified country of origin labels and food safety enhancements as the determinants for consumers to pay a premium price; several studies have supported this claim (Kung et al, 2021;Wongprawmas and Canavari, 2017;Wang et al, 2018). Previous studies have indicated that the primary factors affecting purchase intention and the willingness to pay for pork differ (Bellhouse et al, 2010;Lim et al, 2013;Wang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Purchase Intention and Willingness To Pay For Porkmentioning
confidence: 99%