2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-014-1314-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of periodontitis on chemokines in smokers

Abstract: Understanding the local and systemic chemokine responses in smokers will enable the development of biologically-based treatment methods for chronic periodontitis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(70 reference statements)
1
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…10 Higher levels of MCP-1 in serum of smokers with periodontitis than nonsmokers with periodontitis have also been observed. 12 However, smoking status did not affect the association between MCP-1 polymorphism and chronic/aggressive periodontitis in this study. On the other hand, we included teeth extraction number as an independent variable and observed that the more teeth extracted during treatment, the better therapy results obtained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…10 Higher levels of MCP-1 in serum of smokers with periodontitis than nonsmokers with periodontitis have also been observed. 12 However, smoking status did not affect the association between MCP-1 polymorphism and chronic/aggressive periodontitis in this study. On the other hand, we included teeth extraction number as an independent variable and observed that the more teeth extracted during treatment, the better therapy results obtained.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 60%
“…Haytural et al have detected higher MCP-1 levels in serum in smokers with periodontitis than nonsmokers with periodontitis. 12 Smoking might have some effects on MCP-1 levels related to pathogenesis of periodontitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven studies did not report anything about mean pack/year of cigarette smoking . This also might have resulted in bias with regards to the GCF cytokine/chemokine levels, which remains consistent with smoking status …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As importantly, the literature is replete with publications demonstrating differences in host factors (Eren et al 2015, Winning et al 2015, Lutfioglu et al 2016) and oral microbes (Shchipkova et al 2010, Bizzarro et al 2013 in smokers compared to non-smokers. However, it is important to recognize disease variation within the smoking population, and thus critical to delineate the unique biological features of health and disease in the smoking population (Eren et al 2015, Haytural et al 2015. The present study applies an ensemble classification framework (SVA: selectivevoting ensemble classification approach) , Nagarajan & Upreti 2016 for discerning the biology of periodontitis and non-periodontitis populations, while providing insights into potential variations within the periodontitis population.…”
Section: Conflict Of Interest and Source Of Funding Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Haytural et al. ). The present study applies an ensemble classification framework ( SVA : selective‐voting ensemble classification approach) (Nagarajan et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%