2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.09.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of More Restrictive Blood Transfusion Strategies on Clinical Outcomes: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
185
0
9

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
185
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Normovolemic patients were shown to tolerate Hb concentrations between 5 and 6 g/dL. 3 Regardless of the cause of anemia (decreased production of red blood cells, hemolysis or bleeding), 4 the goal of transfusion is to normalize the transport of oxygen 2 and, therefore, the transfusion trigger has different values in different situations, ranging from Hb 7 g/dL in clinically stable children, [5][6][7][8] with acute bleeding 9 and sepsis but no shock; 10 to 7-8 g/dL in the postsurgical period, [11][12][13][14] and 10 g/dL in case of severe sepsis or septic shock. 15,16 Despite this knowledge, several services still adopt different transfusion protocols even for patients in similar clinical contexts, so that higher triggers relate to a greater frequency of transfusion reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normovolemic patients were shown to tolerate Hb concentrations between 5 and 6 g/dL. 3 Regardless of the cause of anemia (decreased production of red blood cells, hemolysis or bleeding), 4 the goal of transfusion is to normalize the transport of oxygen 2 and, therefore, the transfusion trigger has different values in different situations, ranging from Hb 7 g/dL in clinically stable children, [5][6][7][8] with acute bleeding 9 and sepsis but no shock; 10 to 7-8 g/dL in the postsurgical period, [11][12][13][14] and 10 g/dL in case of severe sepsis or septic shock. 15,16 Despite this knowledge, several services still adopt different transfusion protocols even for patients in similar clinical contexts, so that higher triggers relate to a greater frequency of transfusion reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restrictive transfusion strategies were associated with a reduction in hospital mortality but not in 30-day mortality [16]. A review published in 2014 using restrictive hemoglobin transfusion triggers of 7 g/dl showed reductions in in-hospital mortality, total mortality, rebleeding, ACS, pulmonary edema, and bacterial infections compared with liberal transfusion [17].…”
Section: Evidence From Transfusion Trialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No difference in infection risk was found in the disparate populations. 23 The motives for combining medical patients, gastrointestinal bleeding patients, and adults and children in the meta-analysis are not clear.…”
Section: Various Disease Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%