2012 IEEE 1st International Symposium on Wireless Systems (IDAACS-SWS) 2012
DOI: 10.1109/idaacs-sws.2012.6377648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of jitter and jitter buffer on the final quality of the transferred voice

Abstract: This paper deals with analysis of relation between packet delay variations (jitter), length of jitter buffer and final voice transmission quality. For adjusting of IP channel network emulator NISTNet is used. For adjusting of buffer length VoIP client Linphone is used. Criterion of transmission quality is a MOS parameter investigated with an algorithms ITU-T P.862 PESQ and P.863 POLQA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3) Jitter: Jitter is defined as the end-to-end transmission delay difference between selected packets in the same packets stream, without taking into account of eventually lost packets [23], [24]. This parameter is important for a voice application because if the transmission delay varies for a VoIP conversation, the voice quality will be degraded.…”
Section: B Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3) Jitter: Jitter is defined as the end-to-end transmission delay difference between selected packets in the same packets stream, without taking into account of eventually lost packets [23], [24]. This parameter is important for a voice application because if the transmission delay varies for a VoIP conversation, the voice quality will be degraded.…”
Section: B Simulation Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That is an important indicator for assessing the quality of a voice application [24] by giving it one of these values (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) where 5 indicates excellent quality and 1 indicates poor quality.…”
Section: ) Mosmentioning
confidence: 99%