Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms for Real-Time Applications using OPNET Modeler

Khadiri, Karim El; Labouidya, Ouidad; Elkamoun, Najib; Hilal, Rachid

doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2018.090454

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…• Jitter -is defined as the end-to-end transmission delay difference between selected packets in the same packets stream. Unit is ms and lower jitter means better performance [19],…”

Section: Performance Measurement Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Evaluation of Desktop Operating Systems Networking Performance

Vdovjak¹,

Balen²,

Nenadić³

2020

Int. j. electr. comput. eng. syst. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid advancement of network, communication and Internet technology resulted with always-on, always-connected, device-independent and remote online working, business, education and entertainment environment. Consequently, users are searching for solutions and technologies that enable fast and reliable wide area network connection and the typical solution is through using personal computers connected with ethernet cable to network equipment and infrastructure that supports gigabit ethernet connection. Besides the complex network infrastructure that can influence performance, the bottleneck can also be caused by insufficient hardware, operating system and software resources on clients’ machines. Therefore, in this paper a networking performance evaluation of three globally most common and most used versions of Windows operating systems; namely Windows 7TM, Windows 8.1TM and Windows 10TM, on two identical computer systems, is conducted. Networking performance measurements are performed with three different benchmarks: namely iPerf, D-ITG and NetStress. Performance evaluation results showed that a newer versions of an operating system bring certain networking performance improvements but by sacrificing other performances.

show abstract

“…• Jitter -is defined as the end-to-end transmission delay difference between selected packets in the same packets stream. Unit is ms and lower jitter means better performance [19],…”

Section: Performance Measurement Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Experimental Evaluation of Desktop Operating Systems Networking Performance

Vdovjak¹,

Balen²,

Nenadić³

2020

Int. j. electr. comput. eng. syst. (Online)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Thus, instead of keeping different state information for each metric value on the routers, a limited number of state information is kept, and operation delay is minimized. The algorithm of the proposed prioritization model is simulated using the OPNET program [33]. The block diagram of the prioritization algorithm is given in Figure 2 and the flow diagram of the algorithm is presented in Figure 3.…”

Section: Proposed Model and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A priority-based queuing model approach using destination parameters forreal-time applications on IPv6 networks

Demir¹,

Özçeli̇k²

2020

Turk J Elec Eng & Comp Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the early days of the Internet architecture, the most important aim is to transmit data over packet switched networks. The traditional Internet architecture used in these networks lacks quality of service. However, today, as realtime applications increase, it is needed. There are approaches to improving the quality of service using the flow label field in the Internet Protocol version 6 header. In this study, a novel algorithm that uses destination network parameters to reduce queuing and end-to-end delay is created. A round-robin-based time-aware priority queue new model is used within this algorithm. Data packets using this proposed queue are prioritized with metric values of the destination network. In order to provide end-to-end service quality, the prioritization value is used by placing it in the flow label field. For this purpose, a new approach to the use of this field is proposed. Delay, one of the most important factors affecting quality of service, is reduced with the proposed algorithm and flow label usage approach. As a result, the reduction in delay times between 22 and 39 ms resulted in various improvement rates between 16.79% and 35.13%.

show abstract

“…The manual tunneling had higher, and IPv4 had the lowest end-to-end delay, video conferencing packet delay variation, voice packet end-to-end delay, voice packet loss ratio, video conferencing packet loss rate. It was also found that the manual had the lowest voice MOS and jitter [13]. In the same year, M. S. Ali and T. A. Yahiya configured the 6to4 tunnel, native IPv4, and IPv6 on a network for applications HTTP, remote login, and WLAN.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 98%

Performance Comparison Between Different Tunneling Techniques Using Different Routing Protocols

Jain

Payal

2021

Wireless Pers Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Migration to IPv6 becomes a priority with the draining of IPv4 addresses. But both IPv4 and IPv6 have different structures, and directly bringing IPv6 into the current IPv4 network does not work due to their compatibility issues. Therefore, Dual-Stack, Tunneling, and Protocol Translator mechanisms are adopted to smooth the transition between IPv4 and IPv6 networks. The transitions allow us to communicate between both IPv4 and IPv6 networks together despite having their different structures. The proper transition mechanism has to be adopted for a complex network, and the in-depth study and analysis can help find the best transition technique. In this paper, the 6to4 tunneling is configured for a real-time network using real-time applications-FTP and Email, and the performance of the transition between IPv4 and IPv6 addressing networks is evaluated. For analysis, the automatic and manual 6to4 tunneling is configured simultaneously with Routing Information Protocol/ Routing Information Protocol next generation and Open Shortest Path First/Open Shortest Path First version 3 routing protocols. The networks are configured and simulated on the Riverbed Modeler Academic Edition 17.5. These cases are analyzed and compared for global performance parameters as traffic dropped, network convergence duration, and traffic sent. The object performance parameters for point-to-point connections are analyzed as queuing delay and throughput for incoming and outgoing traffic. This novel work is helpful for researchers as it gives a detailed study to choose the appropriate tunneling technique with a mixture of proper routing protocols for efficient performance.

show abstract

Performance Evaluation of IPv4/IPv6 Transition Mechanisms for Real-Time Applications using OPNET Modeler

Cited by 13 publications

References 14 publications

Experimental Evaluation of Desktop Operating Systems Networking Performance

Experimental Evaluation of Desktop Operating Systems Networking Performance

A priority-based queuing model approach using destination parameters forreal-time applications on IPv6 networks

Performance Comparison Between Different Tunneling Techniques Using Different Routing Protocols

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About