2009
DOI: 10.1002/isaf.292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of interchange fees on a nonsaturated multi‐agent payment card market

Abstract: The impact that the level of interchange fees has on the payment adoption rate in a non‐saturated market is investigated. This study is performed under different degrees of consumers' and merchants' awareness of the benefits arriving from the network externalities. In a four‐party scheme, we model explicitly the interactions between consumers and merchants at the point of sale. The interchange fees flow from the acquirers to issuers. We allow card issuers to charge consumers with fixed fees and provide net ben… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained in our simulations are robust to the parameter constellations used; thus, our results can be treated as being generic. In addition, a more detailed analysis of the impact of different levels of consumers and merchants inertia can be found in [20].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained in our simulations are robust to the parameter constellations used; thus, our results can be treated as being generic. In addition, a more detailed analysis of the impact of different levels of consumers and merchants inertia can be found in [20].…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature in this field can generally be divided into models with a single payment card, e.g., [12][13][14][15], and those contributions that address the competition between payment cards, see, e.g., [16][17][18][19]. A multi-agent-based four-party scheme model, which studies the effect of interchange fees on the payment card adoption rate, is presented in [20]. Multi-homing in payment card markets, i.e., consumers holding or merchants accepting more than one payment card, has only recently attracted wider interest in the literature despite being very common in the market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediate debit via electronic payment instruments also removes the usual grace period, a “check float” between purchase day and payment day, thus causing adoption difficulty (Humphrey et al ., ). The successful diffusion of stored‐value cards or smart cards requires increased awareness of both consumers and merchants for multiple payments (Alexandrova‐Kabadjova, ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2004 the Mexican Central Bank (Banco de México) was given legal power to assess the competition of the banking industry and to regulate the retail payments services, including the interchange fee ( [23,21]). Since then, the authorities have been closely involved in the price setting in the payment cards market 1 From 2000 to 2007 a significant switch in the consumers preferences of payment methods is observed, in a way that in 2007 the annual average number of cheque transactions per capital was 94, whilst the annual average number of card transactions per capital was 178 ( [18]) and in particular in the determination of the MIF . Four years letter, in 2008 the annual average number of card transactions per cardholders was 9.75 2 , with an annual increase of 16%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along this line, in order to go further in the understanding of the underlying complex structure of the market, Alexandrova presented the first agent-based four-party scheme model which studies the MIF 's effect on the payment card adoption rate in a non-saturated market [1]. Through simulation of the consumers' and merchants' decisions related to commercial transactions at the point of sale (POS) and to the choice of payment instruments, the growth of the payment card network is observed at the aggregated level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%