2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of increasing dietary energy level during the finishing period on growth performance, pork quality and fatty acid profile in heavy pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
28
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
12
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Meat color values (Table 5), measured via the values of L*, a*, and b*, were not influenced (P > 0.05) by the diets. These results are in agreement with those found by Suarez-Belloch et al (2013), who evaluated net energy (NE) levels for finishing pigs and also found no effects of diet on pork color. Similarly, Zeng et al (2012) observed no differences in pork color of pigs fed different levels of DE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meat color values (Table 5), measured via the values of L*, a*, and b*, were not influenced (P > 0.05) by the diets. These results are in agreement with those found by Suarez-Belloch et al (2013), who evaluated net energy (NE) levels for finishing pigs and also found no effects of diet on pork color. Similarly, Zeng et al (2012) observed no differences in pork color of pigs fed different levels of DE.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The pigs' F: G ratio from 95 to 137 days of age varied (P = 0.01) due to the increase in the ME of the diets (Table 4) improving linearly (Ŷ = 4.9585 -0.0007X -r² = 0.48). These results are in agreement with those obtained by Trindade Neto et al (2005) when assessing ME and digestible lysine levels for pigs in the growth phase; the authors also observed an improvement in F: G due to the increase in dietary energy levels from 3,270 to 3,500 kcal kg -1 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This was unexpected considering the evolution observed in daily apparent digestible energy intake. In fact, several works have shown that the energy content of diet has a high impact on fatness in pigs (Suarez-Belloch et al, 2013) and poultry (Engel et al, 2001). In addition, Latorre et al (2004) found a negative relationship between carcass fatness and yield of main lean cuts.…”
Section: Carcass Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The benefits of an increase in the energy concentration of the diet on reducing ADFI and improving FCR are well documented (Quiniou and Noblet, 2012;Suárez-Belloch et al, 2013), and in agreement with the results of the current research. Pigs eat primarily to satisfy their energy requirements and therefore, energy concentration of the diet is the main factor determining voluntary feed intake (Noblet and van Milgen, 2004).…”
Section: Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Consequently, fewer benefits of increases in dietary energy are expected when the diets are evaluated on NE as compared with DE or ME bases. In addition, many of the studies evaluating the effects of energy concentration of the diet on pig performance do not maintain constant the energy to indispensable AA ratio (Suárez-Belloch et al, 2013;Kerr et al, 2003). When the indispensable AA to energy content ratio of diets are not balanced, the beneficial effects of the high energy diets might disappear, because pig growth is penalized by a potential deficiency in the most limiting AA.…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%