2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-021-05876-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of ferromagnetic layer thickness on the spin pumping in Co60Fe20B20/Ta bilayer thin films

Abstract: in step of 1nm) using ion-beam sputtering technique.2. Structural and morphological study using X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray reflectivity (XRR), Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis.3. A detailed analysis of spin pumping based on range of Co60Fe20B20 and Ta thicknesses.4. Low thicknesses of Co60Fe20B20 (4 & 6nm) follow normal spin pumping behaviour while anomaly is present in thick Co60Fe20B20 (8nm) film heterostructure.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The absence of CoFe(110) Bragg diffraction at ∼45.1°signifies that CoFeB remained in the amorphous state even after thermal annealing. [55][56][57] Generally, the choice of seed and capping layers plays a crucial role in determining the crystallinity of CoFeB. 58 In the case of CoFeB, the presence of Boron (B) as a light element can lead to its migration from the CoFeB matrix towards the seed or capping layer during annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absence of CoFe(110) Bragg diffraction at ∼45.1°signifies that CoFeB remained in the amorphous state even after thermal annealing. [55][56][57] Generally, the choice of seed and capping layers plays a crucial role in determining the crystallinity of CoFeB. 58 In the case of CoFeB, the presence of Boron (B) as a light element can lead to its migration from the CoFeB matrix towards the seed or capping layer during annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The credit behind such low interface roughness goes to the unique benefit that ion beam deposition technique offers. In that, the working pressure during deposition is almost 2 orders lower than the magnetron sputtering as the plasma utilized for sputtering is formed in a separate chamber. , The large surface area (dia = 6 in.) of the sputtering target takes care of the uniformity of the grown layers in the samples (size = 10 × 10 mm 2 ) even at substantially lower thicknesses.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%