2017
DOI: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20161004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of farm size on milk quality in the Brazilian dairy industry according to the seasons of the year

Abstract: Impact of farm size on milk quality in the Brazilian dairy industry according to the seasons of the year.Ciência Rural, v.47, n.11, 2017. INTRODUCTIONMilk produced in Brazil has been seen as having poor quality because it is associated with the large number of small farms and because of the absence of hygiene practices. However, there are few studies proving or quantifying the lower quality of the milk produced on small properties, as described by ALLORE et al. (1997), where they affirm that smaller herds wou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolates were clustered in several pulsotypes (Appendix Figure A1). The genetic variability among the isolates of different farms is most likely due to the nature of the goat milk production in Brazil, which is typically performed by small independent properties (Marcondes et al, 2017), which avoids the exchange of bacteria between them. On the other hand, the occurrence of similar pulsotypes on the same farm indicates transmission between the animals.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolates were clustered in several pulsotypes (Appendix Figure A1). The genetic variability among the isolates of different farms is most likely due to the nature of the goat milk production in Brazil, which is typically performed by small independent properties (Marcondes et al, 2017), which avoids the exchange of bacteria between them. On the other hand, the occurrence of similar pulsotypes on the same farm indicates transmission between the animals.…”
Section: Short Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nos maiores volumes de produção, 1.001 a 3.000 e acima de 3.000 litros de leite, foi encontrado o menor número de produtores, 20%, os quais representam 83% do volume total de produção, indo de acordo ao verificado também por Marcondes et al (2017), que, avaliando a relação entre a escala de produção e a qualidade do leite, concluíram que a produção leiteira é predo minantemente realizada em pequenas propriedades, entretanto, os volumes mais elevados são produzidos por um pequeno número de produtores. Esse cenário é observado no Brasil, em que a atividade leiteira é considerada tradicional no país e, muitas vezes composta por mão de obra familiar sem perspectiva de crescimento e sem enxergar a atividade como uma empresa, assim como acontece em algumas propriedades pontuais no Brasil e também fora dele.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…al. (2015) e Marcondes et al (2017), em que ao comparar os volumes de produção com as médias de CBT, verificouse que os valores de CBT encontrados nas amostras coletadas em propriedades com maiores volumes de produção (faixas de 1.001 a 3.000 e acima de 3.000), que são propriedades consideradas mais tecnificadas e de maior gestão, foram menores que do que 45.000 UFC/mL, enquanto na atual legislação, o valor máximo permitido é de 300.000 UFC/mL. Nas propriedades com menores volumes de produção, as médias foram mais altas, chegando acima do preconizado pela legislação na menor faixa de produção (1 a 200 litros) no período das águas.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…The second factor (F2) was termed Production scale, because it was formed by the variables number of dairy cows, number of cows in milk, daily milk production, and farm size (Table 5). Farm area is an important variable, as it influences production scale and income, (ANDERSEN et al, 2006) and indicates the capacity to produce and stock feed as well as to expand facilities (MARCONDES et al, 2017;DEFANTE et al, 2019). On-farm feed production implies a lower dependency on external feed suppliers (BONDENMÜLLER FILHO & BÁNKUTI, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%