The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
Extended Abstracts of the 2009 International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials 2009
DOI: 10.7567/ssdm.2009.c-8-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Coulomb Scattering on the Characteristics of Nanoscale Devices

Abstract: By using simple and analytical models, we study the impact of Coulomb scattering on the I-V characteristics and the transient behaviour of MOS transistors and inverters. We predict "anomalous" I-V curve shape in highly doped bulk transistors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the effective mobility modelling, we adopt an approach combining, using the Matthiessen rule, a screened Coulomb scattering limited mobility below threshold and a surface roughness limited mobility well above threshold [10] such that µ eff reads as a function of inversion charge μnormalefffalse(Qnormalifalse)=1μC1+Qi/Qc+1+θ2.)(Qnormali/Cnormalox2μ01where µ C refers to the unscreened Coulomb mobility below threshold and µ 0 to the phonon limited low‐field mobility, θ 2 is the second‐order mobility attenuation coefficient, Q c ≈ kT. C ox /(2 q ) is a critical charge delineating the unscreened Coulomb scattering upper limit, and C ox is the gate oxide capacitance per unit area and kT/q is the thermal voltage.…”
Section: Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the effective mobility modelling, we adopt an approach combining, using the Matthiessen rule, a screened Coulomb scattering limited mobility below threshold and a surface roughness limited mobility well above threshold [10] such that µ eff reads as a function of inversion charge μnormalefffalse(Qnormalifalse)=1μC1+Qi/Qc+1+θ2.)(Qnormali/Cnormalox2μ01where µ C refers to the unscreened Coulomb mobility below threshold and µ 0 to the phonon limited low‐field mobility, θ 2 is the second‐order mobility attenuation coefficient, Q c ≈ kT. C ox /(2 q ) is a critical charge delineating the unscreened Coulomb scattering upper limit, and C ox is the gate oxide capacitance per unit area and kT/q is the thermal voltage.…”
Section: Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the effective mobility modelling, we adopt an approach combining, using the Matthiessen rule, a screened Coulomb scattering limited mobility below threshold and a surface roughness limited mobility well above threshold [10] such that µ eff reads as a function of inversion charge…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the effective mobility modeling, we adopt an approach combining, using the Matthiessen rule, a screened Coulomb scattering limited mobility below threshold and a surface roughness limited mobility well above threshold [87] such that µ eff reads as a function inversion charge,…”
Section:  mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V gs is the gate-to-source voltage, V ds is the drain-to-source voltage, U c is the quasi-Fermi level shift along the channel, W is the channel width, L the channel length, µ eff the effective mobility depending on the effective electric field, E eff =(Q i +Q d )/ si (0.5 for electrons and 0.33 for holes) through the universal mobility law[91][92] (Q d being the depletion charge). The inversion charge Q i can be calculated using the Lambert W function where kT/q is the thermal voltage, V th is the threshold voltage, n is the subthreshold ideality factor, n=C ox /(C ox +C d ), C ox is the gate oxide capacitance and C d the depletion capacitance.Drain induced barrier lowering effect can be introduced in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%