2020
DOI: 10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no6.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of Corporate Governance Mechanisms on Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure of Publicly-Listed Banks in Bangladesh

Abstract: The study examines the impact of corporate governance mechanisms, such as board characteristics on corporate social responsibility disclosure (CSRD). The data on CSRD items and board characteristics have been collected by content analysis of the annual reports of 30 publicly-listed banks in Bangladesh covering six years, from 2013 to 2018. More specifically, the directors' report, the chairman's statement, notes to the financial statement and CSR disclosure reports included in annual reports were used to colle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
3
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(54 reference statements)
8
59
3
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This research suggests that the existence of politically connected board members causes a company to disclose less CSR information. This finding is consistent with the previous studies (Hung, Kim, & Li, 2018;Jahid, Rashid, Hossain, Haryono, & Jatmiko, 2020;Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018). Political connections provide advantages to companies, such as making it easier for them to raise funds, reducing their litigation risk (Hung, Kim, & Li, 2018), and reducing public pressure on them (Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This research suggests that the existence of politically connected board members causes a company to disclose less CSR information. This finding is consistent with the previous studies (Hung, Kim, & Li, 2018;Jahid, Rashid, Hossain, Haryono, & Jatmiko, 2020;Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018). Political connections provide advantages to companies, such as making it easier for them to raise funds, reducing their litigation risk (Hung, Kim, & Li, 2018), and reducing public pressure on them (Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several studies found that the existence of politically connected board members decreases CSR disclosures (Hung, Kim, & Li, 2018;Jahid, Rashid, Hossain, Haryono, & Jatmiko, 2020;Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018). This is because the legitimacy coming from CSR can be substituted by the advantages a company gets from its politically connected board (Muttakin, Mihret, & Khan, 2018).…”
Section: H1: Government Ownership Has a Positive Impact On The Extent Of Csr Disclosuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, businesses implement ADISC to legalize their actions and to get social approval. An organization also needs to keep in mind ethical and cultural values to comply with social norms to ensure legitimacy (Jahid et al, 2020). Moreover, the stakeholder theory was formulated by Freeman in 1984.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have commonly used two fundamental theories such as legitimacy and stakeholder theory to consider the effect of CG on CSRD including Kuzey and Uyar (2015); Ghabayen et al (2016); Orazalin (2019); and Jahid et al (2020). The legitimate theory holds that the company must act in accordance with the value systems and social ethical norms (Dowling & Pfeffer, 1975).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%