2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of chemical alteration on the poromechanical properties of carbonate rocks

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe technical and economic success of a CO 2 geological storage project requires the preservation of the site injectivity and integrity properties over its lifetime. Unlike conventional hydrocarbon gas injection, CO 2 injection may imply geochemical reactions between acidified pore fluids and target reservoir formations, leading to modifications of their poromechanical properties. To date, the chemical effects on the host rock mechanical behaviour are not satisfactorily taken into account in sit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1.5 MPa); the density and viscosity values correspond to standard fluid properties at 20°C. We have shown that this set of fluids covers a sufficiently large range of bulk modulus to allow a consistent checking of Biot-Gassmann's equation for an outcrop limestone (Bemer et al, 2016 Carbonate heterogeneity is known to induce scattering effects usually referred to as "path dispersion" (Cadoret et al, 1995). Contrary to the first break picking which may measure the travel time corresponding to fastest paths taken by part of the acoustic energy and thus lead to overestimated acoustic velocities, the computation of the phase velocity minimizes the effect of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Petroacoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1.5 MPa); the density and viscosity values correspond to standard fluid properties at 20°C. We have shown that this set of fluids covers a sufficiently large range of bulk modulus to allow a consistent checking of Biot-Gassmann's equation for an outcrop limestone (Bemer et al, 2016 Carbonate heterogeneity is known to induce scattering effects usually referred to as "path dispersion" (Cadoret et al, 1995). Contrary to the first break picking which may measure the travel time corresponding to fastest paths taken by part of the acoustic energy and thus lead to overestimated acoustic velocities, the computation of the phase velocity minimizes the effect of heterogeneity.…”
Section: Petroacoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Contrary to the first break picking which may measure the travel time corresponding to fastest paths taken by part of the acoustic energy and thus lead to overestimated acoustic velocities, the computation of the phase velocity minimizes the effect of heterogeneity. The measured phase velocities are then more representative of the sample macroscopic behavior (Cadoret et al, 1995;Rasolofosaon and Zinszner, 2012;Bemer et al, 2016). (Adelinet et al, 2018).…”
Section: Petroacoustic Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mineral dissolution and precipitation are micro-scale processes, which may significantly change the mineralogical composition and microstructure of rocks, and consequently affect the effective mechanical rock behaviour at the macro scale. Predicting these changes has a wide practical importance in applied sciences and materials engineering, especially for hydraulically conductive materials where reactive transport takes place ( Figure 1 ): hydrothermal alterations may weaken geological fractures [ 1 ] and fault zones up to their reactivation [ 2 ], chemical degradation of cements may influence the integrity of wells [ 3 , 4 ] and mineral dissolution can lead to significant weakening of geological reservoirs [ 5 , 6 ]. Hence, the quantification of this direct chemical–mechanical interaction is of substantial relevance within the context of risk assessment for most applications related to geological subsurface utilisation such as geothermal energy systems [ 7 , 8 , 9 ], enhanced oil recovery [ 10 , 11 ], radioactive waste disposal [ 12 , 13 ], underground coal gasification [ 14 , 15 , 16 ] and CO 2 or geological energy storage [ 17 , 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%