2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab87fa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of charge collection efficiency and electronic noise on the performance of solid-state 3D microdetectors

Abstract: Microdosimetry has been traditionally performed through gaseous proportional counters, although in recent years different solid-state microdosimeters have been proposed and constructed for this task. In this paper, we analyze the response of solid-state devices of micrometric size with no intrinsic gain developed by CNM-CSIC (Spain). There are two major aspects of the operation of these devices that affect the reconstruction of the probability distributions and momenta of stochastic quantities related to micro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This decreasing of the noise is mainly due to: (a) the optimization of the encapsulation kit and (b) the increasing of the thickness of the diamond SV. 47 Such value is much lower than that reported for ΔE-E monolithic 2 µm thick silicon microdosimeter (corresponding to a water equivalent thickness of approximately 4.5 µm) tested in the same condition measurement. 20 Indeed, this low noise value is comparable with that of a silicon-on-insulator diode array-based microdosimeter 21,48 characterized by a water equivalent SV thickness very similar to that of our device (i.e., about 22 µm).…”
Section: A Microdosimetric Spectracontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This decreasing of the noise is mainly due to: (a) the optimization of the encapsulation kit and (b) the increasing of the thickness of the diamond SV. 47 Such value is much lower than that reported for ΔE-E monolithic 2 µm thick silicon microdosimeter (corresponding to a water equivalent thickness of approximately 4.5 µm) tested in the same condition measurement. 20 Indeed, this low noise value is comparable with that of a silicon-on-insulator diode array-based microdosimeter 21,48 characterized by a water equivalent SV thickness very similar to that of our device (i.e., about 22 µm).…”
Section: A Microdosimetric Spectracontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…One first notes the significantly improved noise performance of the diamond microdosimeter in comparison to that one tested at CNAO facility, 29 about a factor of ten less, in terms of the minimum measurable lineal energy. This decreasing of the noise is mainly due to: (a) the optimization of the encapsulation kit and (b) the increasing of the thickness of the diamond SV 47 . Such value is much lower than that reported for ΔE‐E monolithic 2 µm thick silicon microdosimeter (corresponding to a water equivalent thickness of approximately 4.5 µm) tested in the same condition measurement 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The first one belongs to the U3DTHIN architecture [35,37,50,[57][58][59]. On the basis of the preliminary results with U3DTHIN detectors, a novel architecture based on 3D-cylindrical microstructures was proposed and specifically developed for microdosimetry in hadron therapy [32][33][34]36,[38][39][40][41].…”
Section: Silicon-based 3d Microdosimetersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we designed and fabricated novel radiation detectors with both 3D and 3D-cylindrical architectures, which were etched inside the silicon bulk in the National Center of Microelectronics (IMB-CNM, CSIC, Spain). These 3D microstructures were specifically customized for microdosimetry in PT and they overcame some of the technological challenges in this domain, namely the low noise capability, well-defined sensitive volume, high spatial resolution, and pile-up robustness [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Both architectures reduce the loss of charge carriers due to trapping effects, the charge collection time, and the voltage required for full depletion compared to planar silicon detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation