2002
DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200201000-00022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

IMMUNOEXPRESSION OF p53 PROTEIN AND PROLIFERATING CELL NUCLEAR ANTIGEN IN PENILE CARCINOMA

Abstract: Proliferating cell nuclear antigen staining had no prognostic value for disease progression. Since p53 over expression was associated with tumor progression and cause specific death, perhaps it should be evaluated in staging and therapeutic planning for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I). The estimated visual intensity ofp53 and Ki67 immunostaining was graded into three categories based on p53 and Ki67 index: negative when p53 or Ki67 index was <5% (group 0), weak when the index was >5% and < 50% (group I), strong when >50% (group II) (19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I). The estimated visual intensity ofp53 and Ki67 immunostaining was graded into three categories based on p53 and Ki67 index: negative when p53 or Ki67 index was <5% (group 0), weak when the index was >5% and < 50% (group I), strong when >50% (group II) (19)(20)(21).…”
Section: Tissue Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, tumour marker profiles including several markers with different biological roles are more helpful in assessing a patient's prognosis. Recent evidence suggested that p53 and epithelial cadherin (E-cadherin) might be promising predictors of metastasis in penile cancer [13][14][15]. In the present study we examined various molecular markers (p53, Ki-67, E-cadherin, and matrix metalloproteinase-9, MMP-9) in patients with primary penile cancer to investigate their prognostic value for LNM and cancer-specific survival (CSS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It implies that, besides venous invasion, other factors might also participate in the process of liver metastasis [30][31][32] . PCNA is a kind of non-histone nuclear polypeptide with 36 000 molecular weight, as an assistant protein to DNA polymerase, its content could reflect the degree of cell proliferation [33][34][35][36][37] . Previous studies showed that there was a significant relationship between PCNA labelling and degree of malignancy, vessel invasion, distant metastasis and prognosis [38][39][40][41][42] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%