1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf00688685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immunocytochemical studies in canine neuroectodermal brain tumors

Abstract: Seventy-four canine neuroectodermal tumors were examined immunocytochemically for the presence of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). Eleven oligodendrogliomas were examined for the presence of myelin basic protein (MBP) and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). Twenty-three tumors, including ten astrocytomas, one ependymoma, two glioblastomas, one case of gliomatosis, and nine poorly differentiated gliomas were positive for GFAP. Two astrocytomas, eleven oligodendrogliomas, eight ependymomas, four choroid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
42
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results for GFAP in canine ependymomas have been reported. 21 In contrast, human ependymomas stain for GFAP and NSE.4, 22 The lack of immunoreactivity with GFAP and NSE in neuroepitheliomas could be due to the high degree of cellular undifferentiation in this tumor. Alternatively, absence of immunoreactivity with GFAP and NSE could indicate a non-neuroectodermal origin, e.g., extrarenal nephroblastoma or teratoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar results for GFAP in canine ependymomas have been reported. 21 In contrast, human ependymomas stain for GFAP and NSE.4, 22 The lack of immunoreactivity with GFAP and NSE in neuroepitheliomas could be due to the high degree of cellular undifferentiation in this tumor. Alternatively, absence of immunoreactivity with GFAP and NSE could indicate a non-neuroectodermal origin, e.g., extrarenal nephroblastoma or teratoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GFAP immunoreactivity of ependymoma has been reported to be positive in humans, cats, and horses [3,6,7], but most canine ependymoma including this case were negative for GFAP [1,14]. The reason for the negative finding for GFAP in canine cases is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…7,28 However, a large proportion of CPPs and CPCs strongly expressed GFAP in contrast to previous studies on canine CPTs, in which most tumors did not express GFAP. 7,27,35 In comparison, GFAP immunoreactivity has been reported in 25-58% of human CPTs. 2,28,32 The presence of GFAP in CPTs has been interpreted as evidence of local ependymal differentiation of neoplastic cells.…”
Section: 33mentioning
confidence: 97%