1992
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0897.1992.tb00813.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immune Reproductive Failure: Effect of Nonspecific Immunostimulation in Mouse Model

Abstract: There is much evidence that pregnancy loss may be immunologically mediated. Failure of the maternal immune system to actively support the pregnancy may be responsible for its demise. Potentiation of immune functions has been attempted in humans; however, the success of immunotherapy is still not clear. Thus immunotherapy experiments in mouse models are important. Nonspecific immuno-stimulation with complete Freund adjuvant (CFA) was shown in our laboratory to reverse the tendency to fetal loss in the CBA/J X D… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Immunization of women suffering from recurrent pregnancy loss by diverse means such as paternal or third party leukocytes or immunoglobulins was found to be successful in preventing fetal demise. 3,10,11 Similar results were obtained in the resorption-prone CBA/JxDBA/2J mouse model, which mimics human fetal loss, where immunization with paternal or third party leukocytes carrying the pater-nal MHC haplotype resulted in a decreased resorption rate. 1,12 -14 Also, nonspecific immunomodulation with CFA was shown by us to decrease fetal loss in the CBA/JxDBA/2J model, an effect that was associated with an increased number of Mac-1-positive cells in the spleen and placenta and an increased production of IL-1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Immunization of women suffering from recurrent pregnancy loss by diverse means such as paternal or third party leukocytes or immunoglobulins was found to be successful in preventing fetal demise. 3,10,11 Similar results were obtained in the resorption-prone CBA/JxDBA/2J mouse model, which mimics human fetal loss, where immunization with paternal or third party leukocytes carrying the pater-nal MHC haplotype resulted in a decreased resorption rate. 1,12 -14 Also, nonspecific immunomodulation with CFA was shown by us to decrease fetal loss in the CBA/JxDBA/2J model, an effect that was associated with an increased number of Mac-1-positive cells in the spleen and placenta and an increased production of IL-1.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…1,12 -14 Also, nonspecific immunomodulation with CFA was shown by us to decrease fetal loss in the CBA/JxDBA/2J model, an effect that was associated with an increased number of Mac-1-positive cells in the spleen and placenta and an increased production of IL-1. 15,3 In parallel, it was shown in several mouse models of pregnancy loss that various cytokines are capable of controlling fetal survival by decreasing the resorption rate and supporting placental growth and function. [16][17][18] This data concer with the well established role of various cytokines (especially CSFs), in supporting placental growth and fetal survival.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar normalizing effect of maternal immunopotentiation on the expression of all markers tested was demonstrated also in paraaortic lymph nodes. The immunopotentiationassociated normalization of Mac-1 expression in the uterus in the later stages of pregnancy was also demonstrated in our previous study following immunopotentiation with CFA, which was accompanied by a decreased resorption rate in the resorption-prone CBA/JXDBA/2J mouse combination [10]. In addition, the present data concur with our previous studies, demonstrating an immunopotentiation-associated improvement in reproductive performance, which was accompanied by normalization of TNFa and TGF-h2 expression in various models of teratogenic activity [17,18,23,24] or pregnancy loss [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%