2014
DOI: 10.1017/s0043887114000100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Immigration, Integration, and Support for Redistribution in Europe

Abstract: Immigration poses individual or collective economic risks that might increase citizen support for government redistribution, but can also generate fiscal pressure or undermine social solidarity to diminish such support. These offsetting conditions obscure the net effects of immigration for welfare states. This paper explores whether immigration's effects are mediated by the economic and social integration of immigrants -the degree to which they have unemployment levels, reliance on the welfare state, and harbo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
79
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
9
79
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Others emphasize ethnic tolerance or cosmopolitanism (Hainmueller and Hiscox 2010;Espenshade and Calhoun 1993;Citrin et al 1997;McLaren 2001). Still others focus on cultural and ethnic differences or perceived threats to traditional culture and values, and a decline of "social capital" and trust, that can generate demands for more immigration restrictions (Putnam 2007;Huntington 2004;Dustmann and Preston 2007;Chandler and Tsai 2001;Burns and Gimpel 2000;Fetzer 2000, Harnoss 2014 or affect redistribution policies (see, e.g., Razin et al 2011, Burgoon, 2014, and Alesina et al, 2014 for recent contributions). And some researchers posit that historical experience with diversity and colonialism foster familiarity with difference and make immigration more acceptable politically (Freeman 1979;Olzak 1992;Cornelius et al 2004).…”
Section: Existing Literature and Contribution Of Impalamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others emphasize ethnic tolerance or cosmopolitanism (Hainmueller and Hiscox 2010;Espenshade and Calhoun 1993;Citrin et al 1997;McLaren 2001). Still others focus on cultural and ethnic differences or perceived threats to traditional culture and values, and a decline of "social capital" and trust, that can generate demands for more immigration restrictions (Putnam 2007;Huntington 2004;Dustmann and Preston 2007;Chandler and Tsai 2001;Burns and Gimpel 2000;Fetzer 2000, Harnoss 2014 or affect redistribution policies (see, e.g., Razin et al 2011, Burgoon, 2014, and Alesina et al, 2014 for recent contributions). And some researchers posit that historical experience with diversity and colonialism foster familiarity with difference and make immigration more acceptable politically (Freeman 1979;Olzak 1992;Cornelius et al 2004).…”
Section: Existing Literature and Contribution Of Impalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that immigration can affect the attitudes of natives and migrants with respect to economic insecurities and working practices (Burgoon andRaess 2011, Burgoon 2014), the effects of immigration policies likely extend to welfare states and other public goods. More broadly, immigration policies in general, and admissions policies in particular, may influence cultural and ethnic diversity, social capital, political participation, and partisan alignments (Putnam 2007;Bauer et al 2000).…”
Section: Existing Literature and Contribution Of Impalamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher levels of immigration sometimes reduce support for redistribution, and economic developments play a role (Burgoon 2014;cf. Mewes and Mau 2012).…”
Section: Social Solidarity In a Transnational Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most rapidly expanding area of research seeking to assess the impact of immigration on the political economy of rich democracies is certainly the one linking immigration to the support for and viability of the welfare state (Alesina & Glaeser 2004;Burgoon et al 2012;Burgoon 2014). We differentiate between approaches addressing functional logics and political logics.…”
Section: Welfare Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%