Measuring Immigration Policies: Preliminary Evidence from IMPALA

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Measuring Immigration Policies: Preliminary Evidence from IMPALA Abstract This paper presents the methods and preliminary findings from IMPALA, a database that systematically measures the character and stringency of immigration policies. Based on a selection of data for six pilot countries between 1990 and 2008, we document the variation of immigration policies across countries and over time. We focus on three specific dimensions: the number of entry tracks for economic workers; the measurement and role of bilateral agreements that complement unilateral immigration policies; and aggregation procedures that allow for gauging the stringency of immigration regulations comparatively. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

Measuring and Explaining Cross-Country Immigration Policies

“…3 Hatton (2004) 1990-2005(Jacobs, 2011 Data availability is expected to substantially improve further in the future by a number of ongoing projects such as the International Migration Policy And Law Analysis (IMPALA). The latter attempts to measure immigration policies in a fundamentally different way, distinguishing between different 'entry tracks' (which can be considered the most elementary level in immigration policy) and registering relevant laws and regulations for each of them (Beine et al, 2015). In terms of transparency and comprehensiveness, i.e.…”

“…quality of the data, this will constitute a major step forward. However, as Beine et al (2015) note, projects like IMPALA will probably not resolve all the outstanding issues in the construction of a composite index of (the restrictiveness of) a country's immigration policy. When new datasets like IMPALA become available, they can be fairly easily integrated in future versions of the migration policy indexes.…”

Immigration Restrictions as Active Labor Market Policy: Evidence from the Mexican Bracero Exclusion

“…Beerli and Peri 2015;Kennan 2017), but evidence remains scant, and the bracero program in particular remains little-studied (Kosack 2016). 2 This is in part because immigration policies-like licensing restrictions in trade policy-are inherently di cult to quantify (Beine et al 2015). Historical quasi-experiments are a largely untapped resource, both to establish short-run causal identi cation and to explore the speed of adjustment over time (Lewis 2013, 177, 182).…”

Public beliefs in social mobility and high-skilled migration

“…7 The measure of Mayda (2010) that has been applied by, e.g., Ortega and Peri (2009), is not suitable for studying migration stocks, as it only captures changes in immigration policy without information on initial policy levels. The more current studies by Beine et al (2015) and Beine et al (2016) allow for a cross-country comparison, but only for a very limited number of destination countries with regard to our sample (five destination countries for the years 1999 and 2008 and three destination countries between 1990 and 2008).…”