2016
DOI: 10.15361/1984-5529.2016v44n3p412-420
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Image analysis and peanut seeds performance during the production process

Abstract: During the production process, obtaining high quality seeds is subject to careful management and quality assessment procedure for the stages process. This work aimed to verify the automated system of image analysis (SVIS ®) efficiency to evaluate the peanut seeds physiological potential obtained during the production process. Treatments consisted of plant digging, combine, transportation, drying, storage (two, four, and six months), and the following processing steps: mechanical threshing, classification by si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Alvarenga and Marcos-Filho (2014), in their turn, were able to identify differences in cottonseed vigor during storage. The efficiency of this system was also proved for several other species, including peanuts (Marchi et al, 2011;Barbosa et al, 2016), super sweet corn (Alvarenga et al, 2012), wheat (Silva et al, 2012), beans (Gomes Junior et al, 2014), soybeans (Wendt et al, 2014), sunflower (Rocha et al, 2015), and sorghum (Javorski et al, 2018). When evaluating lots of sweet corn after their physiological conditioning, Gomes Junior et al (2009) observed a relation with other typically used tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Alvarenga and Marcos-Filho (2014), in their turn, were able to identify differences in cottonseed vigor during storage. The efficiency of this system was also proved for several other species, including peanuts (Marchi et al, 2011;Barbosa et al, 2016), super sweet corn (Alvarenga et al, 2012), wheat (Silva et al, 2012), beans (Gomes Junior et al, 2014), soybeans (Wendt et al, 2014), sunflower (Rocha et al, 2015), and sorghum (Javorski et al, 2018). When evaluating lots of sweet corn after their physiological conditioning, Gomes Junior et al (2009) observed a relation with other typically used tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…been successfully reported for several species, such as pumpkin (Silva et al 2017), peanut (Barbosa et al 2016), corn (Castan et al 2018), wheat (Brunes et al 2016), sunflower (Rocha et al 2015), bean (Gomes Junior et al 2014) and soybean (Marcos Filho et al 2009, Wendt et al 2014, Yagushi et al 2014, among others. The commercial systems developed for this purpose are powerful tools for collecting image data and making inferences about seed vigor.…”
Section: Abstract Resumomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of computerized analysis of seedlings in evaluation of seed vigor has been reported for various species, including rice (Brunes et al, 2019), maize (Castan, Gomes-Junior & Marcos-Filho, 2018), common bean (Gomes-Junior, Chamma & Cicero, 2014), soybean (Yagushi, Costa, & França, 2014), crambe (Leão-Araújo, Santos, Silva, Marcos-Filho & Vieira, 2017), wheat (Brunes et al, 2016), and peanut (Barbosa, Vieira, Gomes-Junior & Vieira, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%