2016
DOI: 10.1515/cirr-2016-0002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated Fishing Control in the Exclusive Economic Zone: a Brief Appraisal of Regulatory Deficits and Accountability Strategies

Abstract: The conservation of fish stocks in the world’s exclusive economic zones (EEZs), which collectively harbour the vast majority of marine-living resources, is the primary responsibility of coastal States. As the effects of failures by coastal States to protect those stocks from the impacts of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing may extend beyond domestic boundaries, this paper questions whether and how coastal States may be made accountable in respect of their regulatory deficits. With the prolifera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the term refers to the policy and management of fisheries in any fishing activities in the sea. It is carried out in a way that contradicts or avoids laws related to the conservation and management of fishing, both domestic and international [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the term refers to the policy and management of fisheries in any fishing activities in the sea. It is carried out in a way that contradicts or avoids laws related to the conservation and management of fishing, both domestic and international [8].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for IUU fishing, a central issue is how it would be determined and then how the subsidy obligation would be triggered [6,7]. The draft text explicitly links IUU fishing as activities set out in the FAO's 2001 International Plan of Action [8]. The draft also grants shared authority among a coastal Member, a flag state, or relevant Regional Management Organization (RFMO) in making an affirmative determination if a vessel or operator is engaged in IUU fishing.…”
Section: Evolution and Assessment Of The Draft Textmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kerugian akibat illegal fishing diperkirakan sebesar Rp 27 trilyun sampai Rp 54 trilyun setiap tahunnya (Nikijuluw, 2008), sedangkan menurut Widodo bahwa illegal fishing telah mengakibatkan kerugian ekonomi sebesar 20 milyar dolar AS per tahun dalam Aini (2016). Kegiatan illegal fishing di perairan Indonesia sangat merugikan Negara Indonesia setiap tahunnya, menurut Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan Negara Republik Indonesia Susi Pudjiastuti dalam Daniel (2014) (Rosello, 2016). Upaya untuk melawan illegal fishing diperairan Indonesia yaitu: pengembangan sistem pengawasan, pengembangan industri perikanan terpadu, regionalisasi pengelolaan sumber daya, perbaikan sistem perizinan, sistem pengawasan dan pengembangan sistem peradilan perikanan dalam Neka (2010) .…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified