IHRM in developing countries: does the functionalist vs. critical debate make sense South of the Equator?

Abstract

A recent debate has taken place in International Human Resource Management (IHRM) theory and practice between the so-called functionalists and the critical approaches. This paper reviews the literature on mainstream, functionalist IHRM and the critical approaches, and theoretically discusses their fit to emerging countries' realities and multilatinas experience. The essay's main objectives and contributions are: (a) to argue that this debate, overly typical of the American-European context, may not be fully applicable to ambiguous and contradictory contexts, such as most developing countries and, particularly, Latin America; (b) to argue that the disputes between both functionalist and critical IHRM theorists, in equally richer countries, is inadequate for other (non-rich-involving) contexts; and (c) to propose redirection possibilities for this debate, particularly, in Latin America.

Gestão De Recursos Humanos Sustentável E Responsabilidade Socioambiental: Uma Agenda Para Debates

“…This first proposition starts from the idea that the legitimacy of HRM as a historically consolidated knowledge area is associated with the search for sustainability by managing relations between people. This requires reevaluating theoretical frameworks in order to overcome their inconsistencies (Caldas, Tonelli, & Braga, 2011;Delbridge, Hauptmeier, & Sengupta, 2011;McLennan & Banks, 2019). Making sure that "relations between people" are at the center of HRM is more appropriate than accepting unitarism, since Management field incorrectly assumes that systematically controlling social relations is possible (Grey, 2004).…”

The role of privacy invasion and fairness in understanding job applicant reactions to potentially inappropriate/discriminatory interview questions

“…Previous research showed that cultural factors such as cultural values and communication styles are associated with differences in fairness and privacy perceptions (Harris et al, 2003;Rustemli and Kokdemir, 1993). Moreover, a number of researchers have argued that HR practices based on Western contexts may not be applicable to other parts of the world (Caldas et al, 2011;Posthuma et al, 2014). Given that the legal and cultural contexts in the UAE are different from those in a Western context, it is possible that job applicants in the UAE might report different perceptions of and reactions to fairness and invasion of privacy than those reported by Western applicants.…”

Competencies for Human Resource Management in Foreign-Owned Firms. Focus on Three CEE Countries and Austria

“…This implies that the role of HR in global business ventures is crucial when it comes to implementing organizational strategies with sensitivity to cultural influences (Pucik, 1996). A number of researchers have identified that among the challenges and contradictions MNCs face, there is the need to be simultaneously local and global in scope, to be centralized and decentralized (Bures and Vloeberghs, 2001;Caldas et al, 2011;Doz and Prahalad, 1986;Evans et al, 2002;Hill, 2014), and to maintain a dynamic balance between implementing global standard practices and localization if they are to become transnational (Bartlett and Ghoshal, 1998). Along with being performed differently, HRM is also conceptualized differently in different countries (Lazarova et al, 2008).…”