1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf01977685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identity and pathogenicity of Rhizoctonia spp. associated with bare patch disease of cereals at a field site in Western Australia

Abstract: Roots of seedlings of wheat and barley affected by bare patch disease at a field site in Western Australia were assessed for root damage and plated to isolate fungi. The patches were variable in shape and size and had the most severely affected plants in the centre. Of the 165 isolates of Rhizoctonia spp. obtained, 90% were multinucleate and 10% binucleate, the former being predominant in the plants at the centre of the patch. The relative frequency of binucleate isolates increased with proximity to the periph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(13 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some authors (i.e. Roberts and Sivasithamparam, 1986) reported that in wheat fields soil infested with R. solani, the center of disease patches was dominated by this fungus, while the populations of binucleate Rhizoctonia were distributed along the margins of these patches, suggesting that these isolates could be involved in controlling the spread of these disease patches by means of antagonistic phenomena against pathogenic R. solani strains, despite the fact that some binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates have been reported to be pathogens on wheat.…”
Section: Pathology and Hypovirulence In The Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some authors (i.e. Roberts and Sivasithamparam, 1986) reported that in wheat fields soil infested with R. solani, the center of disease patches was dominated by this fungus, while the populations of binucleate Rhizoctonia were distributed along the margins of these patches, suggesting that these isolates could be involved in controlling the spread of these disease patches by means of antagonistic phenomena against pathogenic R. solani strains, despite the fact that some binucleate Rhizoctonia isolates have been reported to be pathogens on wheat.…”
Section: Pathology and Hypovirulence In The Complexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We found that ZG1-5 and ZG1-4 caused severe root rot on all genotypes tested. ZG1-5 and ZG1-4 are known to have wide host range and are among the most commonly isolated R. solani group associated with root rot/bare patch of cereals and legumes (Roberts and Sivasithamparam 1986;Sweetingham et al 1986;Neate et al 1988;Sweetingham 1990;MacNish et al 1993;Roget 1995;MacNish and Neate 1996;Schillinger and Paulitz 2006). AG8 strains are normally associated with bare-patch disease in the field and require specific soil conditions to express their pathogenicity (Gill et al 2000(Gill et al , 2001a(Gill et al , b, c, 2002.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The patches can recur in the same field for several years, and may change shape or size from one season to the next (MacNish, 1985). Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn has been considered to be the causal agent of this disease (Roberts & Sivasithamparam, 1986;Ogoshi et ai, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus is divided into binucleate (BN) and multinucleate (MN) groups based on nuclear number per cell of young vegetative hyphae. Roberts & Sivasithamparam (1986) reported that the multinucleate isolates were the most pathogenic, while binucleate isolates were moderately to mildly pathogenic to cereals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%