2020
DOI: 10.3390/f11091020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying Variables to Discriminate between Conserved and Degraded Forest and to Quantify the Differences in Biomass

Abstract: The purpose of this work was to determine which structural variables present statistically significant differences between degraded and conserved tropical dry forest through a statistical study of forest survey data. The forest survey was carried out in a tropical dry forest in the watershed of the River Ayuquila, Jalisco state, Mexico between May and June of 2019, when data were collected in 36 plots of 500 m2. The sample was designed to include tropical dry forests in two conditions: degraded and conserved. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the interrelations between stand structure characteristics and precipitation were also observed in tropical seasonal forest. Nevertheless, the climate factors and BA did not jointly affect AGB in this biome, which has been revealed in other studies due to influences of the topography [104][105][106], soil properties, management protocols, and species diversity [107][108][109][110]. Additionally, we found that the contribution of climate and stand factors to AGB in tropical and temperate forests was greater than that in boreal forest, but the potential ecological reasons remained unclear on a large scale.…”
Section: Determinants Of Co-driving Agb Among Climate Stand Structura...supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Similarly, the interrelations between stand structure characteristics and precipitation were also observed in tropical seasonal forest. Nevertheless, the climate factors and BA did not jointly affect AGB in this biome, which has been revealed in other studies due to influences of the topography [104][105][106], soil properties, management protocols, and species diversity [107][108][109][110]. Additionally, we found that the contribution of climate and stand factors to AGB in tropical and temperate forests was greater than that in boreal forest, but the potential ecological reasons remained unclear on a large scale.…”
Section: Determinants Of Co-driving Agb Among Climate Stand Structura...supporting
confidence: 66%
“…Irrational logging causes alteration in the vegetation structure, which has led to a greater increase and continuity of forest fuels, resulting in a greater possibility of res (Gao et al 2020). Fuel beds in highly disturbed sites have a higher ignition potential and C emissions through ne fuels (1 and 10 h) and litterfall, while the medium fuels (100 h) spread the re, coarse fuels (1000 h) are related to their intensity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous analysis using the same field survey data showed that only three forest structure attributes (canopy cover, canopy height, and AGB) were significantly different between degraded and conserved forest, by a Wilcoxon test (Table 1; Gao et al, 2020b). Thus, only the best models of these three attributes were used to construct the maps of degraded forest.…”
Section: Mapping Forest Degradationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Thus, only the best models of these three attributes were used to construct the maps of degraded forest. We classified TDF into degraded and conserved forest using thresholds of forest attributes defined by a logistic regression in the above-mentioned study, achieving an overall accuracy of 72.22%-80.56% (Gao et al, 2020b). For AGB, the threshold is 27.5 Mg/ha, for canopy cover it is 90.9% and for canopy height it is 5.3 m (Gao et al, 2020b).…”
Section: Mapping Forest Degradationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation