2015
DOI: 10.22215/timreview864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identifying the Challenges in Commercializing High Technology: A Case Study of Quantum Key Distribution Technology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This condition may vary because of no transparent business model (BM). As Natsheh et al [11] revealed, one of the factors that need to be considered during technology commercialization is a good business model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This condition may vary because of no transparent business model (BM). As Natsheh et al [11] revealed, one of the factors that need to be considered during technology commercialization is a good business model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, the criteria involve the proposal’s technical merits; therefore, the endorsement conveys technology validation. This technology validation can be especially critical for the success of technology-based SMEs (Natsheh et al, 2015; Takalo and Tanayama, 2010). In developing our theoretical framework, which explicates causal processes by which SMEs first apply for, and then respond to, technology validations, we draw from insights on institutional theory.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Formal endorsements convey positive attributes that might otherwise be hidden to those seeking information about the focal firm (Djupdal and Westhead, 2013; Lounsbury and Glynn, 2001). Technology validation is a special type of endorsement that provides guidance regarding the validity of the technology being developed (Natsheh et al, 2015). In turn, this guidance can greatly facilitate the future development of SMEs (Djupdal and Westhead, 2013; Takalo and Tanayama, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%