1985
DOI: 10.1002/elps.1150061202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of rat liver carboxylesterase isozymes (EC 3.1.1.1) using polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing

Abstract: The banding pattern of rat liver carboxylesterases (EC 3.1.1.1) was demonstrated following polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing using standardized conditions. Phenotypic variations, occurring in commonly used inbred rat strains, were compared. Separate isozymes were identified using genetic nomenclature. Individual bands were labelled; their electrophoretic parameters were estimated. Three hitherto genetically undefined zones were dessribed and preliminarily classified as carboxylesteras… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This low abundance makes their purification challenging. Moreover, the identification of rat liver carboxylesterases based on pI values is difficult because of the complexity of their banding patterns and the variation in the reported values from one laboratory to another [30]. These carboxylesterase isoenzymes have overlapping substrate specificities so it is equally difficult to differentiate them by substrate specificity [28,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This low abundance makes their purification challenging. Moreover, the identification of rat liver carboxylesterases based on pI values is difficult because of the complexity of their banding patterns and the variation in the reported values from one laboratory to another [30]. These carboxylesterase isoenzymes have overlapping substrate specificities so it is equally difficult to differentiate them by substrate specificity [28,16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome these and other difficulties with the previous classification, a new but conventional nomenclature of Culex esterases was introduced by . This, in keeping with the rat and mouse esterase nomenclature (Zutphen, 1983(Zutphen, , 1987Bender et al,1984;Simon et al, 1985), refers to enzymes specific for αand β-naphthyl acetate as Estα and Estβ, respectively, with the genes italicised. Numbers for electrophoretically distinct enzymes are allocated historically, Culex tarsalis (Coquillett) CtaEstα1 Current A 3 (Prabhaker et al, 1987) Estβ Series Culex quinquefasciatus (Say) TEMR Estβ1 1 B 1 (Pasteur et al, 1981b;Raymond et al, 1987) MRES Estβ1 2 B 1 & B 8 (Bisset et al, 1995;Guillemaud et al, 1996) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…They are thus good model proteins to investigate the mechanism of protein retention in the ER lumen. Their primary structure is encoded in four different genes (Simon et al, 1985). They are glycosylated, some show structural microheterogeneity (Mentlein et al, 1980;Robbi & Beaufay, 1983;Simon et al, 1985), and all migrate in SDS/polyacrylamide gels as -60 kDa polypeptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%