Identification of High School Physical Education Teacher Assessment Model

Winarno, M. E.; Yudasmara, Dona Sandy; Taufik, Taufik; Nurrul, Riyad Fadhli

doi:10.2991/icssh-18.2019.27

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Adapun kelengkapan instrumen penilaian pengetahuan di RPP pada pelajaran PJOK di Sembilan SMPN Malang rata-rata dapat dikategorikan "baik", karena sebagian besar belum dilengkapi petunjuk dan kunci jawaban atau rubrik penilaian dengan jelas. Hasil tersebut senada dengan penelitian dari (Winarno, Yudasmara, Taufik, & Fadhli, 2019) bahwa instrumen penilaian yang dibuat guru PJOK dalam RPPnya cenderung berbentuk esai dan tidak dilengkapi kunci jawaban yang jelas, serta soal belum berkualifikasi HOTS.…”

Section: Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pengetahuan Pjok DI Smp Negeri Malangunclassified

Penilaian Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang

Mustafa

Winarno

Supriyadi

2019

Jur.Pend.Teo.Pen.Peng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of the assessment of knowledge and skills PESH in Junior High School Malang City. This study uses an evaluation approach using the model discrepancy. The results of this study on the implementation of the assessment of knowledge and skills can be said to be good. This is because the assessment document is not necessarily the same as the material in the Lesson Plan. Recommendations for the assessment of knowledge should the knowledge assessment rubric be arranged clearly, practically, qualifying questions with a high level of thinking and varied. Recommendations for skills assessment should be clear assessment rubrics, according to student characteristics, practical, and varied.Abstrak: Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi pelaksanaan penilaian pengetahuan dan keterampilan PJOK pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan evaluasi dengan menggunakan discrepancy model. Hasil penelitian ini pada pelaksanaan penilaian pengetahuan dan keterampilan dapat dikatakan baik. Akan tetapi, dokumen penilaian belum tentu sama dengan materi pada Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran. Rekomendasi untu penilaian pengetahuan sebaiknya rubrik penilaian pengetahuan disusun dengan jelas, praktis, soal berkualifikasi berlevel kognitif tinggi dan bervariasi. Rekomendasi untuk penilaian keterampilan sebaiknya rubrik penilaian jelas, sesuai karakteristik siswa, praktis, dan bervariasi.

show abstract

Section: Pelaksanaan Penilaian Pengetahuan Pjok DI Smp Negeri Malangunclassified

Penilaian Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang

Mustafa

Winarno

Supriyadi

2019

Jur.Pend.Teo.Pen.Peng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Many researchers have studied the 2013 curriculum in physical education learning (Hardiyono et al, 2021;Kurniawan, 2015;Nugroho et al, 2018;Rahardyan & Purnama, 2020;Suherman, 2019;Syarif et al, 2019). This 2013 curriculum research tends to discuss about evaluation of the 2013 curriculum (Alaswati et al, 2016;Muslimin & Destriana, 2020;Octaviansyah et al, 2015;Rahardyan & Purnama, 2020), implementation of the 2013 curriculum in schools (Andika et al, 2013;Badu et al, 2021;Cahyono et al, 2019;Darmawati, 2014;Fauzi, 2019;Nico & Zarwan, 2019;Pangaribuan & Aufan, 2020;Syarif et al, 2019), analysis of curriculum change (Yulianto et al, 2017), teaching style analysis in the 2013 curriculum (Pambudi, 2014), assessment of the 2013 curriculum (Marpaung et al, 2019;Mustafa, 2021;Winarno et al, 2019), the impact of changes to the 2013 curriculum (Widiyono & Tandiyo, 2015), and the effectiveness of learning time of physical education in the 2013 curriculum (Hakim et al, 2020;Rahmi et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Trends and patterns of 2013 curriculum research in physical education: Bibliometric analysis from 2013-2020

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of the 2013 curriculum in physical education learning in schools is an issue that has emerged in recent years. The main objective of this study is to conduct a systematic analysis of trending research literature, especially on the topic of the 2013 curriculum in physical education, using bibliometric analysis. This study uses a bibliometric analysis approach with the help of the VOSViewer application. The articles' search results show that the study of the 2013 curriculum in physical education totaled 106 articles which were published from 2013-2020 using three databases, namely Scopus, Google Scholar and Dimensions. Then, the researchers conducted a filter that was only limited to journal articles and proceedings. And checked for duplication of articles. Based on the checking, it was found that the same 8 articles were published in the three databases, so that the final result was 89 articles. Based on the VOSViewer mapping, the findings reveal that: the number of publications from 2013 to 2020 has increased; of the 89 published articles, all of the authors are from the State of Indonesia, because the topics discussed (Curriculum 2013) are the education curriculum in Indonesia; M. E. Winarno (State University of Malang) was the author with the most publications (6 documents); the sources that published the most articles were Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (12 documents); the most influential article (77 citations) is entitled "Management of Curriculum Implementation: Strategies for Strengthening the Implementation of the 2013 Curriculum", and an interesting article is discussed about aspects of assessment in the 2013 curriculum; Keywords that often appear are "physical education" and "curriculum 2013". For further researchers, they can see interesting topics to be studied for the future.

show abstract

Table tennis reactive agility test, test-retest reliability

Fajri,

Tomoliyus,

Alim

et al. 2023

Fiz Pol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Reactive agility is an important ability every table tennis athlete should have. Reactive agility is needed in all sports because it can help the body move backward, sideway steps, and forward quickly during practice or competition. Therefore a particular test instrument is required. Valid and reliable test instruments are needed to determine a table tennis athlete’s level and level of reactive agility. The results of previous studies showed Aiken’s V coefficient value above 0.76, while Cronbach’s Alpha and ICC are 0.875. Based on previous research, it was found that the results of the reactive agility test have content validity with Aiken’s quite good. However, a Test-retest reliability test is needed to strengthen the instrument. This study aims to assess the reliability of the product moment instrument reactive test agility of table tennis. Test-retest is used as a source of research data. The subjects in the study were 20 table tennis athletes aged 13-18 years. The test was carried out 2 times using a table tennis agility reactive instrument on different days. The time recorded during the test is research data. The data is presented in a descriptive statistical format, then analyzed using SPPS and reliability results using Pearson product-moment. The results showed that the product-moment correlation value was 0.956. based on the norms of reliability coefficients, the reactive agility test instruments specifically for table tennis have high scores or excellent categories. So it can be concluded that it can be relied upon to measure the reactive agility ability of junior and senior table tennis athletes.

show abstract

Identification of High School Physical Education Teacher Assessment Model

Cited by 3 publications

References 15 publications

Penilaian Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang

Penilaian Pendidikan Jasmani, Olahraga, dan Kesehatan pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Negeri Kota Malang

Trends and patterns of 2013 curriculum research in physical education: Bibliometric analysis from 2013-2020

Table tennis reactive agility test, test-retest reliability

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About