2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-020-04406-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of flash-floods-prone river reaches in Beas river basin using GIS-based multi-criteria technique: validation using field and satellite observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AHP and soil conservation service curve number (CN) methods are commonly used methods for drawing flash flood hazard maps. The AHP is used to assign grades and weights and is usually used to assign weights to the causes of mountain torrents in the study of flash flood hazards [1,53,93]. The SCS model is commonly used in distributed hydrological models and research in arid and semiarid regions, which is a method developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to estimate runoff and peak discharge [94].…”
Section: Study Analytical Methods Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP and soil conservation service curve number (CN) methods are commonly used methods for drawing flash flood hazard maps. The AHP is used to assign grades and weights and is usually used to assign weights to the causes of mountain torrents in the study of flash flood hazards [1,53,93]. The SCS model is commonly used in distributed hydrological models and research in arid and semiarid regions, which is a method developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) to estimate runoff and peak discharge [94].…”
Section: Study Analytical Methods Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the AHP allocates weights and relative significance based on the PCM to all causative factors for flooding, the consistency and reliability of the AHP-PCM model needs to be checked (Das, 2020;Singh et al, 2021). Equation 5 used a consistency ratio to assess the consistency of the pairwise decision matrix based on the AHP model in section 2.6 (Saaty, 1980):…”
Section: Consistency Checkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is used to determine the weights of factors based on the pairwise comparison matrix (PCM) in order to conclude the extent to which one alternative factor outweighs another (Mahmoud and Gan, 2018;Al-Abadi and Al-Qurnawy, 2021). The key advantage of the AHP approach is that it is understandable to decision-makers, simple to implement, and adaptable in terms of factor selection (Singh et al, 2021). Currently, the RS and GIS-based AHP modelling is widely and efficiently applied for detecting and mapping flood-susceptible zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current section emphasized the methods adopted for deciding the threshold VI score to classify the sub-basins between low and highly vulnerable. Present research has used three different scientific techniques for this purpose such as: 1) Mean method, 2) Natural breaks (Jenks) method, and 3) Standard deviation method, respectively to find the Optimal Threshold Value (OTV) (Chung and Lee 2009;Bhattacharya et al 2020;Singh et al 2020), a minimum value above which the maximum of given regions become vulnerable. In this case, VI score (0.457) is considered as OTV (derived from the standard deviation method), see Fig.…”
Section: Threshold Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%