2008
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcn019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identification of Dynamin as an Interactor of Rice GIGANTEA by Tandem Affinity Purification (TAP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this, no morphological or developmental defects were observed in single homozygous drp2a or drp2b mutants. By contrast, Abe et al (2008) reported an aerial rosette phenotype in 50 to 90% of plants from homozygous drp2a (drp2a-1, drp2a-2, and drp2a-3) and drp2b (drp2b-2 and drp2b-3) single mutant lines compared with only in 10% of wild-type plants. We did not observe aerial rosettes in either wild-type or any drp2a or drp2b mutant plants analyzed in this study, suggesting that different growth conditions may be required for the manifestation of this phenotype.…”
Section: Drp2a and Drp2b Play Functionally Redundant Roles In Plant Dmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Consistent with this, no morphological or developmental defects were observed in single homozygous drp2a or drp2b mutants. By contrast, Abe et al (2008) reported an aerial rosette phenotype in 50 to 90% of plants from homozygous drp2a (drp2a-1, drp2a-2, and drp2a-3) and drp2b (drp2b-2 and drp2b-3) single mutant lines compared with only in 10% of wild-type plants. We did not observe aerial rosettes in either wild-type or any drp2a or drp2b mutant plants analyzed in this study, suggesting that different growth conditions may be required for the manifestation of this phenotype.…”
Section: Drp2a and Drp2b Play Functionally Redundant Roles In Plant Dmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The former two certainly have shown their merits in the identification of binary interactions; AP-MS is complementary to Y2H and PCA, since it isolates and identifies protein complexes rather than binary interactions. Several studies reported the development of an AP-MS approach in rice, two based on purification from cultured cells (Zhong et al 2003;Abe et al 2008), and three based on experiments on 6-8-week-old seedlings (Rohila et al 2006(Rohila et al , 2009Dong et al 2013). However, the majority only purified one complex, which makes it difficult to evaluate these individual platforms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that frame, five AP-MS approaches have so far been presented using rice for screening PPIs. Three used cultured cells, and their performance has been proven with the isolation of interaction partners of the TATA-BINDING PROTEIN (Zhong et al 2003), GIGANTEA (Abe et al 2008) or the FERTI-LILZATION-INSENSITIVE ENDOSPERM 2-polycomb protein complex (Nallamilli et al 2013). The fourth approach reported the purification of VIRESCENT YEL-LOW LEAF associated proteins from shoots of 6-8-weekold seedlings (Dong et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LINKING THE PROTEOME & organisms, through varying the nature of the two tags to maximize complex recovery (Burckstummer et al, 2006). TAP protocols were thus designed for insect cells (Forler et al, 2003), mammalian cells or transgenic organisms (Bouwmeester et al, 2004;Angrand et al, 2006;Jeronimo et al, 2007), and plants (Rohila et al, 2004;Abe et al, 2008). Among recent improved versions of TAP, Glatter et al (2009) optimized a whole workflow integrating MS analysis, to get efficient and robust protein complex identification from human cells.…”
Section: Short Overview Of Affinity Purification Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%