Linking the proteins—Elucidation of proteome‐scale networks using mass spectrometry

Abstract

Proteomes are intricate. Typically, thousands of proteins interact through physical association and post‐translational modifications (PTMs) to give rise to the emergent functions of cells. Understanding these functions requires one to study proteomes as “systems” rather than collections of individual protein molecules. The abstraction of the interacting proteome to “protein networks” has recently gained much attention, as networks are effective representations, that lose specific molecular details, but provide the ability to see the proteome as a whole. Mostly two aspects of the proteome have been represented by network models: proteome‐wide physical protein–protein‐binding interactions organized into Protein Interaction Networks (PINs), and proteome‐wide PTM relations organized into Protein Signaling Networks (PSNs). Mass spectrometry (MS) techniques have been shown to be essential to reveal both of these aspects on a proteome‐wide scale. Techniques such as affinity purification followed by MS have been used to elucidate protein–protein interactions, and MS‐based quantitative phosphoproteomics is critical to understand the structure and dynamics of signaling through the proteome. We here review the current state‐of‐the‐art MS‐based analytical pipelines for the purpose to characterize proteome‐scale networks. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., Mass Spec Rev 30:268–297, 2011

Proteomic analysis of the NOS2 interactome in human airway epithelial cells

“…Mass spectrometry (MS) is now recognized as an essential tool for the unbiased characterization and quantitative analysis of protein interaction networks [37–39]; however, thus far, MS-based efforts have revealed only a few NOS2-interacting proteins [23,35]. Here, we sought to adapt modern MS-based methods for large scale and unbiased identification of the NOS2-interacting proteins in human airway epithelial cells, and we sought to quantify whether, and to what end, cellular stimuli (i.e.…”

Mass spectrometry and animal science: Protein identification strategies and particularities of farm animal species

“…Detailed information on these approaches can be find in the recent review by Ning et al [33]. For detailed comparison of gel-free and gel-based experimental strategies refer to the interesting article by Pflieger et al [28]. Martyniuk et al have recently reviewed the use of gel and non-gel based methods as tools for aquatic ecotoxicology studies to identify and characterize protein bioindicators of adverse effects, namely in teleost fishes [34].…”

“…This is in contrast with gel-free based approaches, such as liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, which performs analysis on peptides consequently losing information on molecular mass, pI and protein isoforms. However, in simplified protein mixtures mass spectrometry allows the more exact determination of protein molecular masses as well as the characterization of their post-translational modifications, in terms of identification and localization in the polypeptide sequence [28][29][30].…”

Proteomics and Systems Biology for Understanding Diabetic Nephropathy

“…Computational prediction provides only indirect evidence of interactions. In the realm of proteomics, utilizing mass spectrometry for large scale identification of protein interaction networks is becoming more common [112]. …”