2013
DOI: 10.12957/psi.saber.soc.2012.4898
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Identificação com o grupo: adaptação e validação de uma medida geral para o contexto brasileiro / Group identification: adaptation and validation of a general measure for the Brazilian context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although most studies treat identification as a general connection to the in-group and operationalize it as a one-dimensional construct (Postmes, Haslam, & Jans, 2013;Reysen, Katzarska-Miller, Nesbit, & Pierce, 2013;Wachelke, 2012), this approach seems to be inadequate conceptually and empirically (for reviews, see Ashmore, Deaux, & McLaughlin-Volpe, 2004;Leach et al, 2008;Sellers, Smith, Shelton, Rowley, & Chavous, 1998). As a solution, some studies have identified components of in-group identification such as "self-categorization," "affective commitment," and "centrality" (e.g., Cameron, 2004;Ellemers, Kortekaas, & Ouwerkerk, 1999;Jackson, 2002;Luhtanen & Crocker, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies treat identification as a general connection to the in-group and operationalize it as a one-dimensional construct (Postmes, Haslam, & Jans, 2013;Reysen, Katzarska-Miller, Nesbit, & Pierce, 2013;Wachelke, 2012), this approach seems to be inadequate conceptually and empirically (for reviews, see Ashmore, Deaux, & McLaughlin-Volpe, 2004;Leach et al, 2008;Sellers, Smith, Shelton, Rowley, & Chavous, 1998). As a solution, some studies have identified components of in-group identification such as "self-categorization," "affective commitment," and "centrality" (e.g., Cameron, 2004;Ellemers, Kortekaas, & Ouwerkerk, 1999;Jackson, 2002;Luhtanen & Crocker, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kang and Kim (2010) define identification with the group as a force that connects or attracts individuals to the group. When individuals have a strong identification with a group, the destiny of the group and its collective processes and results become important for their self-image, thus stimulating cooperation (Kane, 2010;Wachelke, 2013). Identification with the group should thus promote an attitude favorable to knowledge sharing (Sordi et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%