2019
DOI: 10.1080/02615479.2019.1691163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ICT, young people and social work: distances and opportunities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we also concur with the statements of McCarty and Clancy (2002), and those of Reamer (2015b). We therefore agree with the contributions of other research that affirm this positive relationship between social work and new technologies, such as De Lucas and D’Antonio (2020), Fuente and Martín (2019), Hidalgo and Lima (2018), Raya (2018), or Baker et al (2018).…”
Section: Conclusion/discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Here, we also concur with the statements of McCarty and Clancy (2002), and those of Reamer (2015b). We therefore agree with the contributions of other research that affirm this positive relationship between social work and new technologies, such as De Lucas and D’Antonio (2020), Fuente and Martín (2019), Hidalgo and Lima (2018), Raya (2018), or Baker et al (2018).…”
Section: Conclusion/discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Here, we can highlight the contributions of Hill and Shaw (2011), Del Fresno and López-Peláez (2013), Warburton et al (2014), Mishna et al (2014) or Dellor et al (2015). More recently, we find research by De Lucas and D’Antonio (2020) on the usefulness of ICTs for social work with young people; Fuente and Martín (2019) on social work and older people; Hidalgo and Lima (2018), who demonstrated their importance at European level; Raya (2018), who showed the effectiveness of new technologies as an element that makes social inclusion possible; or Baker et al (2018), who apply the usefulness of new technologies in social work through Participatory Action Research (PAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%