ICT, educational technology and educational instruments. Will what has worked work again elsewhere in the future?

Abstract

Computers in education have been around for more than 30 years. They have been the vector not only of diverse forms of educational technology, but also of many new kinds of learning activities using software instruments. With the gradual trivialization of computer systems, the initially rather positive expectations about computers in education have progressively turned into more skeptical attitudes about the use of ICT. What is really working with computers in education? Was the investment worth the outcomes? The number of scientific studies focusing on these issues is huge. Most of their results have been obtained either by very focused experiments on some educational technology, generally involving a limited number of students, or by surveys, taking into account large numbers of learners but with little control about the kind of activities that were actually organized. Overall, hardly any conclusive results about possible causal implications of using ICT in learning have been obtained and there is no evidence about the stability of existing results over time. This paper, particularly taking into account the French experience, draws attention on the specific case of software instruments. These instruments do not exactly aim at performing more efficiently existing activities, but lead to invent new learning activities better in line with constructivist views. It suggests that, besides studies about what works, more research is in order about how it works and contends that what will work in the future is linked to the capability of the teaching profession and their allies to collectively build and discuss new interrogations and solutions to pedagogical problems, which will sustain and regulate the many discoveries of innovators.

Integrating computer‐supported collaborative learning into the classroom: the anatomy of a failure

“…2011). Research on the integration of educational technologies into the classroom has a history spanning several decades (Baron & Bruillard 2007). Because computer‐supported collaborative learning (‘CSCL’) technologies have only emerged relatively recently, with the increasingly widespread use of Internet in society, there have been relatively few studies of their appropriation in the classroom (cf.…”

Évaluation des technologies éducatives émergentes : les aléas de la conception, un facteur d’instabilité pour la définition des problématiques de recherche?

“…Les conditions n'ont en définitive pas été réunies pour mener une expérimentation randomisée et l'accumulation des problèmes a fait obstacle à l'étude de l'utilité des étayages comme envisagé initialement. En d'autres termes, nous avons fait face aux difficultés associées à la mise en place de méthodes expérimentales en éducation, fréquemment évoquées dans la littérature scientifique (Baron et Bruillard, 2007;Biesta, 2010), d'autant que la généricité des résultats produits posait problème.…”