<i>Symposium</i>‘The politics of international recognition’

Agné, Hans; Bartelson, Jens; Erman, Eva; Lindemann, Thomas; Herborth, Benjamin; Kessler, Oliver; Chwaszcza, Christine; Fabry, Mikulas; Krasner, Stephen D.

doi:10.1017/s1752971913000018

Cited by 43 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Muslim integration which accommodate Muslim from country around the world was another term of international recognition of Taiwan as national identity. Taiwanese people who lead the mosque and social interaction among multiculturalism also as a unique pattern that represent of the term of recognition [24]- [26]. On the other hand, I also argue that the unify of Muslim which representing different national identity could be the symbolize of conception of Muslim country recognition.…”

Section: Conclusion: Beyond Internatinal Recognition Of Taiwanmentioning

confidence: 83%

Multicultural a Diversity: Experience from Muslim Society in Kaohsiung Taiwan

Rivai¹

2018

Proceedings of the International Conference on Diversity and Disability Inclusion in Muslim Societies (ICDDIMS 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taiwan is not the Muslim country, the tolerance from native Taiwan to Muslim migrant in Kaohsiung city could be inspired to other non-Muslim country for multicultural and diversity. Author have fieldwork on eight months at Kaohsiung mosque to interpreted that the interaction from various nations, languages, and culture. There are two important finding that could describes on this study. Firstly, this study interpreted the multicultural and diversity internally of Muslim society in Kaohsiung mosque. Secondly, it is interesting that how native Taiwan respect to the Muslim society in Kaohsiung Mosque. This study recommend that the next research would analyze interaction between Muslim migrant and Taiwan society outside of Kaohsiung Mosque.

show abstract

Section: Conclusion: Beyond Internatinal Recognition Of Taiwanmentioning

confidence: 83%

Multicultural a Diversity: Experience from Muslim Society in Kaohsiung Taiwan

Rivai¹

2018

Proceedings of the International Conference on Diversity and Disability Inclusion in Muslim Societies (ICDDIMS 2017)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A politics of confrontation is not the same as a politics that seeks to undermine state legitimacy by drawing on alternative sources of authority and tacit international recognition to establish an independent presence, namely, a politics of recognition (for a longer discussion, see Agné, 2013). When a Rohingya team applies to play in the World A politics of recognition is made still more potent by taking on functions that are uniquely considered the state's domain, notably, a population census.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

‘Immanent Nation: The Rohingya quest for international recognition'

Abraham

Jaehn

2019

Nations and Nationalism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper lies at the intersection of scholarly literatures on forced migration, politically engaged diasporas, and the use of online platforms and digital technologies for political ends. It follows the efforts of a group of Rohingya diasporic activists using a variety of means, online and offline, to contest the claims and authority of Myanmar, an established territorial state. Their actions can be subsumed into two kinds of politics, a politics of confrontation and a politics of recognition. Taken together, these actions lead to an emergent political formation, a reterritorialised, dispersed, and virtual national community that seeks to mimic some state functions without explicitly calling for self‐determination or an independent nation‐state. This paper follows four activist projects: YouTube‐based Rohingya TV, the effort to join the ConIFA alternative World Football Cup tournament, the campaign to have the Rohingya script recognized by the Unicode Consortium, and the effort to build a database for undocumented Rohingyas using blockchain. This complex of social, political, electronic, and virtual relations is situated against a 20th century political imaginary built around the homeland–people–language trinity, dialectically producing an immanent contradiction.

show abstract

“…The major themes that unify this set of sovereignty practices are recognition (e.g. Agné et al, 2013; Epstein et al, 2018), diplomacy (e.g. Loh, 2019; Pouliot, 2016), and the workings of international organizations such as the United Nations (UN), the European Union (EU), and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN).…”

Section: Three Spaces Of Sovereigntymentioning

confidence: 99%

Liminal sovereignty practices: Rethinking the inside/outside dichotomy

Loh¹,

Heiskanen²

2020

Cooperation and Conflict

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sovereignty is the core concept of international relations. Almost without exception, approaches to sovereignty in IR have followed a binary framing where sovereignty is seen to consist of two components: ‘internal’ versus ‘external’ sovereignty, ‘positive’ versus ‘negative’ sovereignty, and so on. These dichotomies stem from the prevailing understanding of sovereignty as the boundary between the inside and the outside of the state. This article builds on and expands these existing approaches by reconceptualizing the sovereign border line as a liminal border space. Relatedly, we theorize the concept of liminality in greater depth by distinguishing between four distinct kinds of liminality: marginal, hybrid, interstitial, and external. Each of these problematizes the dividing line of sovereignty in unique but comparable ways. We empirically illustrate these four kinds of liminality with reference to contested states, ‘tribal’ or ‘indigenous’ groups, NGOs such as Amnesty International, and extremist groups such as ISIS, respectively. Each of these types of liminality entails unique actors, practices, and consequences for the concept of sovereignty. We suggest that liminal sovereignty practices represent the most radical source of change for the concept of sovereignty, yet at the same time, somewhat counterintuitively, they also serve as the best means of clarifying existing, established meanings and practices of sovereignty.

show abstract

Symposium‘The politics of international recognition’

Cited by 43 publications

References 20 publications

Multicultural a Diversity: Experience from Muslim Society in Kaohsiung Taiwan

Multicultural a Diversity: Experience from Muslim Society in Kaohsiung Taiwan

‘Immanent Nation: The Rohingya quest for international recognition'

Liminal sovereignty practices: Rethinking the inside/outside dichotomy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About