Salmonella in Domestic Animals. 2000
DOI: 10.1079/9780851992617.0169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Salmonella infections in cattle.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
80
0
5

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
80
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…signs (Wray & Davies 2000, Veling et al 2002. Classically, these signs have been useful in monitoring the evolution of the disease; however, changes in these parameters are difficult to quantify (Deignan et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…signs (Wray & Davies 2000, Veling et al 2002. Classically, these signs have been useful in monitoring the evolution of the disease; however, changes in these parameters are difficult to quantify (Deignan et al 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both groups of calves behaved in the same way. Affected animals with salmonellosis show high fever between 40.5 and 42 °C (Wray and Davies 2000), but the curves of temperature may vary according to the model used, because in general, Salmonella infections present a variety of clinical manifestations depending on age of the animal, serotype and pathogen dose (Sarwari et al, 2001). In this study, high fever became apparent soon after the administration of the pathogen, only 12 h post infection (figure 1) in contrast with other studies that observed a slower response, which led the animals to manifest fever among 24 and 72 h post infection (Paulin et al 2002, Silva et al 2010.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was designed to investigate safety and efficacy of N-RM25 in animals in a particular age group (≤ 6 weeks old) because these animals are the most susceptible to both S. Dublin and S. Typhimurium infection [52,54]. In addition, salmonellosis in adult cattle caused by S. Dublin often results from the reactivation of infection in prolonged latent carriers due to various types of stress rather than being a direct result of recently acquired infection [35,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cattle industries, introduction of modern intensive production and large-scale trading systems have resulted in an increased risk of animals being exposed to a wide range of Salmonella serovars [2,43,52], some of which have developed resistance to multiple antimicrobial agents [31,33]. To address this, a prophylactic approach to controlling a broad S. Typhimurium and 4-5 weeks for S. Dublin [52,54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%