2017
DOI: 10.1128/aac.02209-16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

In Vitro Activity of Imipenem-Relebactam against Gram-Negative ESKAPE Pathogens Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in the United States in 2015 (Results from the SMART Global Surveillance Program)

Abstract: ) is an inhibitor of class A and C ␤-lactamases, including Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), and is currently in clinical development in combination with imipenem-cilastatin. Using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)-defined broth microdilution methodology, we evaluated the in vitro activities of imipenem-relebactam, imipenem, and seven routinely tested parenteral antimicrobial agents against Gramnegative ESKAPE pathogens (including Klebsiella pneumoniae, n ϭ 689; Acinetobacter baumanni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
80
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
80
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that both Imipenem and Amikacin are effective antibiotics against all gram negative bacilli isolates. The latter is in concomitant with a recent work where both Imipenem and Amikacin were well effective against gram negative bacilli [28]. The E. coli isolates in our specimens showed various degrees of resistance to Ciprofloxacin, Co-trimoxazole, Tetracycline, Gentamicin which is in agreement with a similar study where E. coli resisted to these antibiotics with a slight differences [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The results showed that both Imipenem and Amikacin are effective antibiotics against all gram negative bacilli isolates. The latter is in concomitant with a recent work where both Imipenem and Amikacin were well effective against gram negative bacilli [28]. The E. coli isolates in our specimens showed various degrees of resistance to Ciprofloxacin, Co-trimoxazole, Tetracycline, Gentamicin which is in agreement with a similar study where E. coli resisted to these antibiotics with a slight differences [29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…IMI‐REL has been evaluated against Enterobacteriaceae in several studies (Table 1). Overall, IMI‐REL demonstrates excellent in vitro activity, with susceptibility rates above 95% for Klebsiella pneumoniae , Escherichia coli , Citrobacter spp . , and Enterobacter spp .…”
Section: Microbiology and Spectrum Of Activitymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Activity of IMI‐REL against Pseudomonas aeruginosa has been evaluated in several in vitro studies (Table 1). In general, 94% of P. aeruginosa demonstrated susceptibility to IMI‐REL. However, susceptibility rates were lower among P. aeruginosa with known resistance to imipenem.…”
Section: Microbiology and Spectrum Of Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) represents a serious threat for public health and requires their rapid identification to implement proper infection control measures to prevent further spread in hospitals and initiate proper treatments. Although very few novel antibiotics are, or will be, available for the treatment of CPE, the most promising therapies involve combinations of a broad-spectrum ␤-lactam and novel ␤-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam) active on class A carbapenemases and on class D (for avibactam only) but not on MBLs (6,7). During the last 3 years, several methods have been developed for the detection of CPE, including (i) tests able to detect carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity (Carba NP test and derivatives [8][9][10], matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight [MALDI-TOF] protocols [11,12], Bogaerts-Yunus-Glupczynski [BYG] test [13], carbapenem inactivation method [CIM] test [14,15], and ␤ Carba [16]), (ii) immuno-chromatographic tests for the rapid detection of KPC, OXA-48-type, and NDM carbapenemases (17)(18)(19), (iii) combination disk diffusion assays (20), and (iv) molecular-based techniques that aim to detect the most widespread carbapenemase-encoding genes (21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%