A novel algorithm designed for the screening of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE), based on faropenem and temocillin disks, was compared to that of the Committee of the Antibiogram of the French Society of Microbiology (CA-SFM), which is based on ticarcillin-clavulanate, imipenem, and temocillin disks. The two algorithms presented comparable negative predictive values (98.6% versus 97.5%) for CPE screening among carbapenem-nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae. However, since 46.2% (n ϭ 49) of the CPE were correctly identified as OXA-48-like producers by the faropenem/temocillin-based algorithm, it significantly decreased the number of complementary tests needed (42.2% versus 62.6% with the CA-SFM algorithm).KEYWORDS OXA-48, KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP disk diffusion susceptibility testing, bacterial susceptibility testing, carbapenemase, disk diffusion C arbapenem resistance caused by carbapenemase production has been increasingly reported worldwide in Enterobacteriaceae (1, 2). In most of the cases, these carbapenemases belong to Ambler class A (mostly KPC and GES types) (3), Ambler class B or metallo--lactamases (MBLs) of VIM, IMP (1, 2), and NDM types (4), or carbapenemhydrolyzing Ambler class D -lactamases (CHDLs) (mostly OXA-48-like) (5). The spread of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) represents a serious threat for public health and requires their rapid identification to implement proper infection control measures to prevent further spread in hospitals and initiate proper treatments. Although very few novel antibiotics are, or will be, available for the treatment of CPE, the most promising therapies involve combinations of a broad-spectrum -lactam and novel -lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam) active on class A carbapenemases and on class D (for avibactam only) but not on MBLs (6, 7). During the last 3 years, several methods have been developed for the detection of CPE, including (i) tests able to detect carbapenem-hydrolyzing activity (Carba NP test and derivatives [8][9][10] , (iii) combination disk diffusion assays (20), and (iv) molecular-based techniques that aim to detect the most widespread carbapenemase-encoding genes (21-23).The ability to infer from routine antibiogram the presence of a carbapenemase is often complicated and requires complementary tests, leading to additional delay and cost for clinical laboratories. Accordingly, it is of importance to develop solutions (e.g., algorithms) with high sensitivities and negative predictive values (NPVs) to discriminate