1958
DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1958.13.3.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Cervical Vagotomy on Pulmonary Ventilation and Mechanics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
8
1
1

Year Published

1964
1964
1992
1992

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
8
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lung conductance was decreased in spontaneously breathing rabbits [Karczewski and Widdicombe, 1969] and sheep [Colebatch and Halmagyi, 1963]. In spontaneously breathing dogs [Lim et al, 1958] found no significant change in lung conductance after vagotomy, so that changes of airway calibre and lung compliance are not consistent with increased alveolar ventilation which might decrease the PaCO2. The insignificant arterial oxygen changes after vagotomy (Table III) are also consistent with these results.…”
Section: Effect Of Vagotomy On Animals Breathing Airmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Lung conductance was decreased in spontaneously breathing rabbits [Karczewski and Widdicombe, 1969] and sheep [Colebatch and Halmagyi, 1963]. In spontaneously breathing dogs [Lim et al, 1958] found no significant change in lung conductance after vagotomy, so that changes of airway calibre and lung compliance are not consistent with increased alveolar ventilation which might decrease the PaCO2. The insignificant arterial oxygen changes after vagotomy (Table III) are also consistent with these results.…”
Section: Effect Of Vagotomy On Animals Breathing Airmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…These recent results on the effects of vagotomy and of 260 W. KARCZEWSKI AND J. G. WIDDICOMBE efferent vagal stimulation show some similarities and some clear differences between cats (Olsen, Colebatch, Mebel, Nadel & Staub, 1965), dogs (Lim, Luft & Grodins, 1958;Nadel & Widdicombe, 1962;Olsen et al 1965;Green & Widdicombe, 1966) and sheep (Colebatch & Halmagyi, 1963). In recent studies on the role of the vagus nerves in drug induced bronchoconstrictions and anaphylaxis in anaesthetized rabbits (Karczewski & Widdicombe, 1969 a, b) we first determined (as control observations) the effect of vagotomy and efferent vagal stimulation on lung mechanics, breathing and some circulatory variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Bilateral vagotomy has no significant effect on lung compliance of cats (Olsen et al 1965), sheep (Colebatch & Halmagyi, 1963) and dogs (Lim et al 1958;Olsen et al 1965;Green & Widdicombe, 1966), whether spontaneously breathing or paralysed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas a decrease in conductance (-280/o) on vagus cooling and an increase (+8%) on vagotomy were found in anesthetized, paralyzed, and artificially ventilated rabbits; surprisingly, reversed results were noted in spontaneously breathing rabbits (Karczewski and Widdicombe 1969). Bilateral cervical vagotomy has no significant effect on lung compliance of cats (Olsen et al 1965), sheep (Colebatch and Halmagyi 1963) or dogs (Lim et al 1958;Olsen et al 1965;Green and Widdicombe 1966). However, our experimental model, spontaneously breathing anesthetized dog, always shows a significant fall in dynamic pulmonary elastance (Edyn) on bilateral cervical vagal block with novocaine or vagotomy Ulmer 1979,1975;Ulmer and Islam 1974;Lanser et al 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%