2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0958344003000922
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CALL, commercialism and culture: inherent software design conflicts and their results

Abstract: This article investigates commercial software design practices as they specifically relate to foreign language education. Commercial educational software companies currently produce the majority of language learning software available on the market. Commercial ventures producing CALL software share many design practices that call into question their educational validity. The design practices of commercial CALL software companies are incongruent with the goals of foreign language education. The problems associa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those application developers who collect and consider recommendations of the end users, in our case, these are early childhood education specialists, have much potential to produce a digital resource that will be well accepted, better integrated and longer used. Moreover, open-access state-funded applications may avoid problems commonly found in commercial massproduced software such poorly localized content, including visual contents (Golonka et al, 2014;Reeves & McKenney, 2013;Shaughnessy, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those application developers who collect and consider recommendations of the end users, in our case, these are early childhood education specialists, have much potential to produce a digital resource that will be well accepted, better integrated and longer used. Moreover, open-access state-funded applications may avoid problems commonly found in commercial massproduced software such poorly localized content, including visual contents (Golonka et al, 2014;Reeves & McKenney, 2013;Shaughnessy, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%