2014
DOI: 10.1002/2013jb010739
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hysteresis and coercivity of hematite

Abstract: In room-temperature hysteresis, 14 submicron hematites (0.12-0.45 μm) had large coercive forces H c (150-350 mT), while 22 natural 1-5.5 mm hematite crystals had H c = 0.8-23 mT (basal-plane measurements). Single-domain (SD) and multidomain (MD) hematites owe their high H c mainly to magnetoelastic anisotropy, caused in fine particles by internal strains and in large crystals by defects like dislocations, with a smaller contribution by triaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy. A strong correlation between H c an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
85
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
11
85
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Brown‐colored burnt daub contains a minor amount of hematite which is not detected on the thermomagnetic curves (Figure c). The coercivity of this hematite is considerably lower compared to that in the orange‐red or purple‐colored materials (Table S2), suggesting that it is probably of a grain size at the boundary between SD and SP states (Özdemir & Dunlop, ) where B cr sharply decreases. Therefore, magnetic grain size data show an increasing size of both magnetite/maghemite and hematite particles formed during daub burning from SP toward SD magnetic grain size with increasing burning temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Brown‐colored burnt daub contains a minor amount of hematite which is not detected on the thermomagnetic curves (Figure c). The coercivity of this hematite is considerably lower compared to that in the orange‐red or purple‐colored materials (Table S2), suggesting that it is probably of a grain size at the boundary between SD and SP states (Özdemir & Dunlop, ) where B cr sharply decreases. Therefore, magnetic grain size data show an increasing size of both magnetite/maghemite and hematite particles formed during daub burning from SP toward SD magnetic grain size with increasing burning temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Hematite has its magnetization confined within its basal plane with triaxial anisotropy; for randomly oriented hematite particles, M rs / M s = 0.75 (Dunlop, ). Thus, the maximum possible M rs / M s value depends on the type of anisotropy, where, for example, magnetite with elongation >~1.3 has a shape‐dominated uniaxial anisotropy, while greigite has cubic anisotropy (Roberts et al, ), and hematite and monoclinic pyrrhotite have triaxial anisotropy within their basal planes (e.g., Martín‐Hernández et al, ; Özdemir & Dunlop, ). Magnetism in titanomagnetite is controlled by internal stress, which has usually been considered to be uniaxial.…”
Section: Factors That Affect Data Distributions In a Day Diagrammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MB results should give a higher weight percentage because it includes additional blocked superparamagnetic hematite particles that do not contribute to the remanence at 300 K. The SD assumption is reasonable because SD behavior in hematite occurs over a wide grain size interval (i.e., 0.030 to 10μm, Özdemir and Dunlop, 2014). Applying the same assumption for the rest of the sample set, there is ~0.2-0.3% hematite by mass in the HM group decreasing to ~0.02% for the LM group.…”
Section: Forms and Occurrences Of Ferric Oxide Mineralsmentioning
confidence: 99%