Two experiments assessed adaptation to displacing prisms in hypnotically limbanesthetized subjects. Experiment 1 disconfirmed the hypothesis that the displacement aftereffect is eliminated in limb-anesthetized hypnotic subjects who adapt to prisms in the absence of a visual target. Such subjects showed as large a displacement aftereffect as control subjects who received neither a hypnotic induction procedure nor an anesthesia suggestion. Experiment 2 demonstrated that under some testing conditions hypnotic subjects complied with experimental demands and eliminated the behavioral (but not the perceptual) component of the aftereffect. Theoretical implications are discussed.Subjects who adapt to displacing prisms exhibit a perceptual aftereffect following prism removal. When pointing toward a visual target, they tend to point in the direction opposite to the prism-induced displacement. In several studies Wallace and his associates (Wallace & Garrett, 1973, 1975Wallace & Fisher, 1979) reported that hypnotic suggestions for limb anesthesia administered to highly susceptible subjects eliminated the displacement aftereffect. However, low-susceptible role-playing subjects, instructed to pretend that their arm was anesthetized, showed the displacement aftereffect. Wallace and Garrett (1973) hypothesized that hypnotic limb anesthesia interferes with proprioceptive feedback from the pointing limb and thereby prevents prism adaption. Spanos, Gorassini, and Petrusic (1981) were unable to confirm these results. Instead, they found that highly susceptible hypnotically limbanesthetized subjects, low-susceptible role players, and control subjects who prism adapted without special instructions, all showed large displacement aftereffects. Spanos et al. (1981) hypothesized that the elim-