2015
DOI: 10.11001/jksww.2015.29.1.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for solid recovered fuel and energy recovery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the reaction temperature increased, VM decreased significantly at higher temperature (260 °C and 3 h) (Table 2). The decrease of VM is mainly due to the formation of a higher molecular weight and cross-linking [27]; [28,29]. In contrast, FC values show an increase of 142.44ִ % at 260 °C and 3 h reaction time, and this agrees with other previous studies [21].…”
Section: 2hydrochar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As the reaction temperature increased, VM decreased significantly at higher temperature (260 °C and 3 h) (Table 2). The decrease of VM is mainly due to the formation of a higher molecular weight and cross-linking [27]; [28,29]. In contrast, FC values show an increase of 142.44ִ % at 260 °C and 3 h reaction time, and this agrees with other previous studies [21].…”
Section: 2hydrochar Propertiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…And the raw sludge was treated in a subcritical hydrothermal reactor with electric heater as the control group. Since hydrothermal reactions at 200 °C result in higher organic retention (Jin et al, 2020), more energy-rich hydrothermal carbon (Kim et al, 2015), and less tar production during pyrolysis (Feng et al, 2018a), final temperature was set at 200 °C with the heating rate 10 °C/ min for both the treatments. The residence time for the final temperature was 0.5 h. The slurry left in the reactor was centrifuged at 6000 revolutions/min for 10 min.…”
Section: Hydrothermal Reactionmentioning
confidence: 99%