2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hydrocarbon injection for quantification of chemical erosion yields in tokamaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
72
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(23 reference statements)
6
72
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The impurity release behaviour is to a certain extent similar to the sputtering of carbon from graphite with observation of C + (CII emission), representing physical and chemical erosion, and CD (CD A-X band emission), reflecting solely the chemical erosion with predominantly methane release and break-up into CD [19]. Also the chemical sputtering of graphite vanishes at higher surface temperatures as measured in TEXTOR under comparable edge plasma conditions as in JET [19] and analytically described in [23].…”
Section: Comparison With the Composition Of The Total C Sputtering Yieldmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The impurity release behaviour is to a certain extent similar to the sputtering of carbon from graphite with observation of C + (CII emission), representing physical and chemical erosion, and CD (CD A-X band emission), reflecting solely the chemical erosion with predominantly methane release and break-up into CD [19]. Also the chemical sputtering of graphite vanishes at higher surface temperatures as measured in TEXTOR under comparable edge plasma conditions as in JET [19] and analytically described in [23].…”
Section: Comparison With the Composition Of The Total C Sputtering Yieldmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Also the chemical sputtering of graphite vanishes at higher surface temperatures as measured in TEXTOR under comparable edge plasma conditions as in JET [19] and analytically described in [23]. However, the chemical sputtering process and the energy of the radicals produced is different in the case of Be and C, whereas the latter is thermally released.…”
Section: Comparison With the Composition Of The Total C Sputtering Yieldmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The tile embedded LP (KY4D [6]) and Paschen/Balmer recombination spectroscopy (KT3) provide T e and n e , radiated powers are obtained with the divertor bolometry system (KB5 [7]) and the divertor neutral density n D is supplied by a sub-divertor neutral pressure gauge (KT5P). In-situ the hydrocarbon flux Γ CD and the incident particle fluxΓ D are obtained with the aid of divertor spectroscopy (KS3 [4]) and local CD 4 injection (GIM14). Figure 1a illustrates the detection coverage of the toroidally separated diagnostics in one toroidal plane of the divertor.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up and Plasma Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical sputtering can be described as a function of ion energy, ion flux and surface temperature [3], though uncertainties with respect to data interpretation and extrapolation to detached plasma conditions exist. Recent experiments in Asdex-Upgrade and DIII-D at low surface temperatures (T surface ≅ 350K) showed a reduction of the intrinsic hydrocarbon flux and the chemical sputtering yield under detached conditions in comparison to attached conditions in high density plasmas [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation