2020
DOI: 10.1039/c9se00597h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid photoanodes for water oxidation combining a molecular photosensitizer with a metal oxide oxygen-evolving catalyst

Abstract: Hybrid photoanodes for water oxidation, using an n-semiconductor photosensitized by a molecular dye associated with an inorganic catalyst, are overviewed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optical, electrochemical, and XPS experiments conrmed the formation of the dyad and, in particular, the presence of the Ru catalyst anchored to the TiO 2 photoanode via the dye linker. Both dyad-sensitized photoanodes showed state-of-the-art FE in the O 2 generation process, 8,[45][46][47] with the CBZ-3Py + Ru dyad reaching an average efficiency of nearly 90% and a best cell efficiency of 95%. Moreover, IPCE measurements conrmed the validity of the approach showing efficiencies among the best recorded for similar compounds and noticeably supported the evidence of the formation of dyads when compared to isolated dyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optical, electrochemical, and XPS experiments conrmed the formation of the dyad and, in particular, the presence of the Ru catalyst anchored to the TiO 2 photoanode via the dye linker. Both dyad-sensitized photoanodes showed state-of-the-art FE in the O 2 generation process, 8,[45][46][47] with the CBZ-3Py + Ru dyad reaching an average efficiency of nearly 90% and a best cell efficiency of 95%. Moreover, IPCE measurements conrmed the validity of the approach showing efficiencies among the best recorded for similar compounds and noticeably supported the evidence of the formation of dyads when compared to isolated dyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[152][153][154] Surprisingly, a threefold enhancement in stability was observed in ETL-free devices compared with their mesoporous metal oxide counterpart, [149][150][151] which we attributed to the elimination of OHions from water splitting under illumination of nearultraviolet (UV) light. [155][156][157][158] The mechanism of this degradation will be further discussed in Section 3. Even though ETL-free devices demonstrate better durability, their low PV performance (PCE: %13%) due to poor charge transport properties (FF ≤ 65%) Figure 3.…”
Section: Device Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most investigated photoanodes for PEC cells are based either on passivated conventional semiconductors (e.g., Si or III-V compounds) (Scheuermann et al, 2013) or on low-cost metal oxides, such as hematite (Peter et al, 2012) or bismuth vanadate (Kim and Choi, 2014). An alternative, yet much less developed, concept is represented by "hybrid photoanodes" that comprise a "soft" molecular or polymeric light absorber supported on a wide-gap metal oxide acting as an electron collector and modified with an additional cocatalyst to promote the OER from water (Youngblood et al, 2009;Kirner et al, 2014;Ashford et al, 2015;Swierk et al, 2015;Finke, 2017a, 2017b;Xu P. et al, 2017;Collomb et al, 2019;Zhang et al, 2019). A key advantage of this concept is that the wide-bandgap metal oxide support (e.g., TiO 2 ) has typically a very negative potential of the conduction band edge, which alleviates the need for large external electric bias and makes the coupling with typical photocathodes in a tandem cell more feasible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%