2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0798-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hybrid model based on energy and experimental methods for parallel hexapod-robotic light abrasive grinding operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can also be used in applications that require higher speed combined with precision and higher payload [1][2][3][4]. The examples of using parallel manipulators in high precision modeling and machining are mentioned in [5][6][7]. The kinematic and dynamic analysis of several parallel manipulators has been done in [3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can also be used in applications that require higher speed combined with precision and higher payload [1][2][3][4]. The examples of using parallel manipulators in high precision modeling and machining are mentioned in [5][6][7]. The kinematic and dynamic analysis of several parallel manipulators has been done in [3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The purpose of modeling was to use force models to improve the quality of the process. Often, artificial intelligence methods were used to model the grinding process [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently there are three main methods to compensate for the clamping and positioning error of tool at the end of robot: kinematic calibration methods [11][12][13], measurement and estimation of positional errors using laser trackers [14][15][16][17], and correction of clamping errors by force control [18][19][20][21]. Although the former two methods improve the positioning accuracy of the tool frame, the positioning error caused by the manufacturing and installation of the tool is not speci cally compensated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%