2022
DOI: 10.1007/s15010-022-01817-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humoral immunity in dually vaccinated SARS-CoV-2-naïve individuals and in booster-vaccinated COVID-19-convalescent subjects

Abstract: Background The immune response to COVID-19-vaccination differs between naïve vaccinees and those who were previously infected with SARS-CoV-2. Longitudinal quantitative and qualitative serological differences in these two distinct immunological subgroups in response to vaccination are currently not well studied. Methods We investigate a cohort of SARS-CoV-2-naïve and COVID-19-convalescent individuals immediately after vaccination and 6 months later. We use… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(31 reference statements)
6
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A balance seemed to exist between cellular and humoral immune responses, which dominated at early and late stages of vaccination, respectively. The high serum-neutralizing antibody titers and distinct PBMC transcriptomics of the Month 8 recovery control contrasted to unvaccinated healthy participants, implying that human immunity to SARS-CoV-2 could sustain at least eight months, which supported long-term resistance to SARS-CoV-2, which is consistent with previous studies [36]. While scRNA-seq demonstrated increased B cell levels and altered PBMC transcriptomics from Day 0 to 14 after the first vaccination, the serum-neutralizing antibody titers from Day 14 and 28 were not significantly higher than those before vaccination, implying that scRNAseq was more sensitive than antibody titer assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…A balance seemed to exist between cellular and humoral immune responses, which dominated at early and late stages of vaccination, respectively. The high serum-neutralizing antibody titers and distinct PBMC transcriptomics of the Month 8 recovery control contrasted to unvaccinated healthy participants, implying that human immunity to SARS-CoV-2 could sustain at least eight months, which supported long-term resistance to SARS-CoV-2, which is consistent with previous studies [36]. While scRNA-seq demonstrated increased B cell levels and altered PBMC transcriptomics from Day 0 to 14 after the first vaccination, the serum-neutralizing antibody titers from Day 14 and 28 were not significantly higher than those before vaccination, implying that scRNAseq was more sensitive than antibody titer assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We could observe the same rapid boost in antibody avidity 10 weeks after vaccination in individuals who were previously infected, up to the maximal value of 100%. Other studies have reported a similar net increase in antibody avidity in previously exposed individuals receiving a vaccine booster dose, which was associated with a more efficient binding inhibition of spike to ACE2 in an in vitro competition assay [ 33 ]. It would be interesting to investigate whether this steeper increase in avidity associated with vaccination is caused by an acceleration of affinity maturation in germinal centers or simply reflects an ongoing trajectory towards a more complete process of affinity maturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, at 6 months after the third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine, the level of anti-S antibodies in individuals with a negative SARS-CoV-2 infection history was reported as 379–2960 AU/mL [ 18 ]. Humoral immunity, represented by the neutralization capacity via the ACE2 receptor competition, has also been reported to decrease starting at 6 months after the booster vaccination [ 19 ]. In this study, similar to previous studies, a comparison of anti-S antibodies at 1 and 4 months after the third vaccination revealed that anti-S antibodies had decreased at 4 months compared to 1 month.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%