Objective
To examine the correlation of numerical skills used in patients’ self-management of asthma with asthma-related quality of life (AQOL).
Methods
Adults with moderate-severe asthma completed the Asthma Numeracy Questionnaire (ANQ), assessments of reading comprehension and self-efficacy, and the mini-Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (miniAQLQ). The numeracy-AQOL relationship was evaluated in the context of potential confounders (demographic variables) and mediators (e.g. income and self-efficacy), using tests of correlation then multivariable models to assess for confounders and mediators.
Results
80 adults with moderate or severe asthma were evaluated. Mean ANQ score was 2.3 ± 1.2 (range 0−4). ANQ was correlated with miniAQLQ (ρ=0.24, p=0.03). This association associated with AQOL (age, Latino ethnicity). The ANQ-miniAQLQ association was mediated by household income; the correlation was reduced by 81% when adjusting for income (ρ=0.05, p=0.65). In contrast, self-efficacy less strongly mediated this association; the correlation was reduced by 26% when controlled for self-efficacy (ρ=0.20, p=0.80).
Conclusion
Numerical skills needed for asthma self-management influence AQOL primarily through their impact on income and, to a lesser extent, on self-efficacy.
Practice Implications
Adults with asthma will benefit from self-management instructions employing the simplest mathematical constructs whose understanding is confirmed by clinicians.
Background
Infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) induces a complex antibody response that varies by orders of magnitude between individuals and over time.
Methods
We developed a multiplex serological test for measuring antibodies to five SARS-CoV-2 antigens and the Spike proteins of seasonal coronaviruses. We measured antibody responses in cohorts of hospitalized patients and healthcare workers followed for up to eleven months after symptoms. A mathematical model of antibody kinetics was used to quantify the duration of antibody responses. Antibody response data were used to train algorithms for estimating time since infection.
Results
One year after symptoms, we estimate that 36% (95% range: 11%, 94%) of anti-Spike IgG remains, 31% (9%, 89%) anti-RBD IgG remains, and 7% (1%, 31%) anti-Nucleocapsid IgG remains. The multiplex assay classified previous infections into time intervals of 0–3 months, 3–6 months, and 6–12 months. This method was validated using data from a sero-prevalence survey in France, demonstrating that historical SARS-CoV-2 transmission can be reconstructed using samples from a single survey.
Conclusions
In addition to diagnosing previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, multiplex serological assays can estimate the time since infection which can be used to reconstruct past epidemics.
Direct immune activation via agonistic monoclonal antibodies (mAb) is a potentially complementary approach to therapeutic blockade of inhibitory immune receptors in cancer. Here, we provide genetic analysis of the immunological consequences associated with the use of an agonistic CD40 mAb in a patient with metastatic melanoma who responded, underwent a single metastasectomy, and then achieved a complete remission ongoing for more than 9 years after starting therapy. Tumor microenvironment after immunotherapy was associated with pro-inflammatory modulations and emergence of a de novo T-cell repertoire as detected by next-generation sequencing of T-cell receptors (TCR) in the tumor and blood. The de-novo T-cell repertoire identified in the post-treatment metastasectomy sample was also present – and in some cases expanded – in the circulation years after completion of therapy. Comprehensive study of this “exceptional responder” highlights the emerging potential of direct immune agonists in the next wave of cancer immunotherapies and a potential role for TCR deep sequencing in cancer immune assessment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.