1994
DOI: 10.5860/crl_55_06_499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Humanists Revisited: A Longitudinal Look at the Adoption of Information Technology

Abstract: Developments in information technology have had a major impact on the conduct of research and scholarship. In general, humanists have been slower than scientists and social scientists to adopt new technologies in their work. This paper, a longitudinal study of eleven humanists, corroborates the general pattern and provides insight into why humanists use technology as they do. It relates its findings to a definition of the humanities: those fields of scholarship that strive to reconstruct, describe, and interpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research has revealed that members of the science faculty used the Internet more heavily than did members of the humanities or social sciences faculties (Lazinger et al, 1997). And scholars in humanities have adopted new technologies relatively slowly as compared to other fields (Wiberley, 1991;Wiberley & Jones, 1994). In addition, science and engineering scholars require more current information than do scholars in other disciplines (Ellis, Cox, & Hall, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has revealed that members of the science faculty used the Internet more heavily than did members of the humanities or social sciences faculties (Lazinger et al, 1997). And scholars in humanities have adopted new technologies relatively slowly as compared to other fields (Wiberley, 1991;Wiberley & Jones, 1994). In addition, science and engineering scholars require more current information than do scholars in other disciplines (Ellis, Cox, & Hall, 1993).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 The results of their study showed humanists to be highly productive scholars who work alone, although four of the eleven had coauthored publications during the course of their careers. All relied partially or totally on library collections for their research, and those who used archives or other special collections reported working very closely with the archival staff.…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stone (1982) and Watson-Boone (1994) considered that staff in the humanities were most likely to work alone, tended to rely heavily on library-based materials and rarely used online databases. Wiberley and Jones (1994) have made a longitudinal study of the adoption of information technology (IT) by humanity staff and found that they were slower than scientists and social scientists to adopt new technologies in their work. Although they used word processing and the library OPAC, their use of e-mail was limited.…”
Section: Effect Of Subject Areamentioning
confidence: 99%