2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2007.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRTF personalization based on artificial neural network in individual virtual auditory space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
62
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A three-layer BPNN for nonlinear regression was compared with the proposed approach. According to [6], 8 anthropometric parameters including x 1 , x 3 , x 12 , d 1 , d 3 − d 6 were used as the inputs. The outputs were 12 dimensional weight vectors obtained with PCA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A three-layer BPNN for nonlinear regression was compared with the proposed approach. According to [6], 8 anthropometric parameters including x 1 , x 3 , x 12 , d 1 , d 3 − d 6 were used as the inputs. The outputs were 12 dimensional weight vectors obtained with PCA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the presence of the complex scattering of the incident sound by the head, shoulder, torso and pinna, it is necessary to adopt nonlinear regression methods to customize individual HRIR. Subsequently they presented a nonlinear approach based on a three-layer back-propagation neural network (BPNN) [6] . The inputs of the neural network are some anthropometric parameters selected by correlation analysis and the outputs are the principal components together with the interaural time difference (ITD) of HRTF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the fact that HRTF individualization is strongly related to the anthropometry of a person, methods have been proposed for HRTF personalization by choosing a small set of anthropometry features with a pre-trained model [49][50][51][52][53][54]. The training was established based on a direct linear or nonlinear relationship between the anthropometric data and the HRTFs, where the first step is to reduce the HRTF data dimensionality.…”
Section: Individualized Hrtfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-dimensional PCA representations of HRTFs are often used as targets for regression/interpolation and personalization from predictors such as anthropometry [3,4]. While PCA captures maximal variance along linear bases, non-linear relationships that are visible in HRTFs such as shifted spectral cues (notches/peaks) and smoothness assumptions along frequency are not represented in the versions synthesized using the linear principal components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this may preserve some of the common spectral features in the low frequency ranges, many subject-specific features due to anthropometric variations are lost, leading to localization errors [5]. Many works have sought individualized HRTFs by learning their relationships to subject's anthropometry [6,3,4]. A recent idea achieves some progress by granting listeners full-access to nonindividualized HRTF PCA weights for interactive tuning [7]; while no anthropometric measurements are needed, the user must learn to tune PCA weights w.r.t.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%