2017
DOI: 10.18590/mjm.2017.vol3.iss2.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HPV Vaccination Among Females with Mental and Physical Limitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Females aged 9–26 years and males aged 9–21 years with special needs had a vaccination rate of 32% (vs 37%) in females and 16% (vs 21%) in males. Previous studies have also indicated the lower vaccination rates; however, these studies were limited to small sample size and geography [[38], [39], [40], [41]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Females aged 9–26 years and males aged 9–21 years with special needs had a vaccination rate of 32% (vs 37%) in females and 16% (vs 21%) in males. Previous studies have also indicated the lower vaccination rates; however, these studies were limited to small sample size and geography [[38], [39], [40], [41]].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Other studies used broad definitions of disability such as: children with special health-care needs (CSHCN), [22][23][24] women with physical disabilities, 25 youth attending specialist schools, 26,27 children with neurological diseases, neurodevelopmental disorders, chronic neurological deficits or developmental disabilities, [28][29][30][31][32] and females with mental and physical limitations. 33 The issue with broad definitions is illustrated by two American studies which found no difference between immunization uptake for people with disabilities as compared to their typically developing peers. The first study measured uptake in a cohort of children with special health-care needs 34 and the second explored whether a medical model of care for children with special health care needs improved immunization rates.…”
Section: Disability Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies measured immunization uptake, with 18/28 (64%) calculating the uptake of one or more vaccinations in a population of people with disability. 3,16,[18][19][20][21][22][23][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]37 The recognition of inequities in immunization services for vulnerable populations relies on the existence of disaggregate data. 38 Aggregate immunization uptake figures do not generally identify small populations at risk for under-immunization 38 and therefore lower immunization coverage in people with disabilities can be missed.…”
Section: Immunization Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would expect findings to be similar for the COVID-19 vaccine since both influenza and COVID-19 can lead to serious health consequences for marginalized groups that may motivate individuals to get vaccinated. In contrast, we would expect different findings for the HPV vaccine since studies show that adolescents with disabilities are less likely to get the HPV vaccine compared to their non-disabled peers ( O’Neill, Elia, et al, 2019 ; Rowe et al, 2017 ). Reasons for these discrepancies are not well understood but may be related in part to poor sexual healthcare and education for those with disabilities ( O’Neill, Elia, et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These differences held across a range of participant ages, disabilities, immunization types, and countries of origin ( O’Neill, Elia, & Perrett, 2019 ). For example, researchers found that adolescents with disabilities in both the U.S. and Australia were less likely to initiate or complete Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination schedules compared to their peers ( O’Neill, Elia, & Perrett, 2019 ; Rowe, Pritt, Stratton, & Yoost, 2017 ). Likewise, in a survey study of parental beliefs and practices, researchers found that 50% of participants changed or discontinued their children's vaccination schedules after having a child diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder ( Bazzano, Zeldin, Schuster, Barrett, & Lehrer, 2012 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%