2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01293-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How useful is hand-carried bedside echocardiography in critically ill patients?

Abstract: Although the HC device was able to provide important anatomic information, the device falls far short of SE in the evaluation of critically ill patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerns have been raised that HCU devices may compare less favorably with standard echocardiography when performed in critically ill patients because of the more frequent occurrence of a limited acoustic window. In a study of 80 critically ill patients that compared HCU vs. standard echocardiography, 85% of clinical questions could be addressed by the HCU device (146). HCU failed to detect a clinically significant finding in 31% of patients; however, the majority of these missed findings were Doppler-based diagnoses (e.g., valvular regurgitation).…”
Section: Hand-carried Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerns have been raised that HCU devices may compare less favorably with standard echocardiography when performed in critically ill patients because of the more frequent occurrence of a limited acoustic window. In a study of 80 critically ill patients that compared HCU vs. standard echocardiography, 85% of clinical questions could be addressed by the HCU device (146). HCU failed to detect a clinically significant finding in 31% of patients; however, the majority of these missed findings were Doppler-based diagnoses (e.g., valvular regurgitation).…”
Section: Hand-carried Ultrasoundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to this general success of portable echocardiography, a study based in intensive care units indicated that up to 31% of important findings were missed, probably due to suboptimal imaging 10. Although the technology has advanced since this study, on the basis of our own experience we remain cautious.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…A study by Goodkin et al [24] compared the utility of hand-carried ultrasound versus standard echocardiography in 80 acutely ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), stepdown units, recovery room, and emergency department. All ultrasounds were performed by experienced sonographers and interpreted by echocardiographers.…”
Section: Critical Carementioning
confidence: 99%